Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26939069›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Information Needs and Concerns of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: What Can We Learn from Participants in a Bilingual Clinical Cohort?

Valérie Pittet, Carla Vaucher, Michel H Maillard, Marc Girardin, Philippe de Saussure, Bernard Burnand, Gerhard Rogler, Pierre Michetti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Valérie PittetInstitute of Social & Preventive Medicine (IUMSP), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Carla VaucherInstitute of Social & Preventive Medicine (IUMSP), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Michel H MaillardDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Marc GirardinDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
Philippe de SaussureDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
Bernard BurnandInstitute of Social & Preventive Medicine (IUMSP), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Gerhard RoglerDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Pierre MichettiCrohn and Colitis Center, Clinique La Source-Beaulieu, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine · CHUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHClinique de La Source · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) patients are confronted with needs and concerns related to their disease.

aimTo explore information expectations of patients included in a national bilingual IBD cohort in Switzerland (SIBDC).

methodsThis is a mixed-methods study, comprising 1) a semi-narrative survey sent to 1506 patients from the SIBDC and 2) two focus groups conducted with 14 patients to explore and assess the relevance of the survey's findings. Data collected within the framework of the SIBDC was used to characterize survey's responders.

results728 patients (48%) replied to the survey: 52.5% females, 56% Crohn's disease (CD), 87% secondary/tertiary level educated, 70% full/part-time employed. On average, 47% of patients sought for information, regardless of the disease stage; 27% of them were dissatisfied with information received at the time of first symptoms. During flares, 43% were concerned about drugs and therapies; in remission, 57% had concerns on research and developments; 27% searched for information linked to daily disease management. Information-seeking increased when active disease, for CD with high levels of perceived stress (OR = 2.47; p = 0.003), and for all with higher posttraumatic stress symptoms. The focus groups confirmed a perceived lack of information about general functioning, disease course, treatments and their risks, extra-intestinal symptoms and manifestations.

conclusionsInformation remains insufficient for IBD patients. Lack of information in specific domains can potentially cause stress and hinder detection of symptoms. Better information should be considered as a potentially important component in improving patients' outcomes in IBD.

Indexed as

Information Seeking BehaviorMultilingualismNeeds AssessmentAdultCohort StudiesColitis, UlcerativeCrohn DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsGastroenterologyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicProfessional-Patient Relations

Identifiers

PMID26939069
PMCPMC4777374
OpenAlexW2289084864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.