ArticleNature biotechnology2016
First, design for data sharing.
Article in Nature biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-scale digital twins for personalized medicine.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Opportunities for improving data sharing and FAIR data practices to advance global mental health.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2023Review
- Essential requirements for the governance and management of data trusts, data repositories, and other data collaborations.International journal of population data science · 2023Article
- Digital Phenotyping in Clinical Neurology.Seminars in neurology · 2022Article
- The Data Tags Suite (DATS) model for discovering data access and use requirements.GigaScience · 2020Article
- Indicators of retention in remote digital health studies: a cross-study evaluation of 100,000 participants.NPJ digital medicine · 2020Article
- Physical activity, sleep and cardiovascular health data for 50,000 individuals from the MyHeart Counts Study.Scientific data · 2019Article
- Data Lakes, Clouds, and Commons: A Review of Platforms for Analyzing and Sharing Genomic Data.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2019Review
- An analysis and metric of reusable data licensing practices for biomedical resources.PloS one · 2019Article
- Informed Consent in Biomedical Research.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2019Review
- Registered access: authorizing data access.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2018Article
- Through Patients' Eyes: Regulation, Technology, Privacy, and the Future.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2018Article
- Evaluation of smartphone-based testing to generate exploratory outcome measures in a phase 1 Parkinson's disease clinical trial.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2018Article
- The challenges of the expanded availability of genomic information: an agenda-setting paper.Journal of community genetics · 2018Article
- DNA.Land is a framework to collect genomes and phenomes in the era of abundant genetic information.Nature genetics · 2018Article
- Precision medicine at the crossroads.Human genomics · 2017Article
- Consent Processes for Mobile App Mediated Research: Systematic Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2017Article
- Consent and engagement, security, and authentic living using wearable and mobile health technology.Nature biotechnology · 2017Article
- The Asthma Mobile Health Study, a large-scale clinical observational study using ResearchKit.Nature biotechnology · 2017Observational
- Dynamic Consent: a potential solution to some of the challenges of modern biomedical research.BMC medical ethics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26939011What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.