Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26938613›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Zero-Heat-Flux Thermometry for Non-Invasive Measurement of Core Body Temperature in Pigs.

Maria Guschlbauer, Alexandra C Maul, Xiaowei Yan, Holger Herff, Thorsten Annecke, Anja Sterner-Kock, Bernd W Böttiger, Daniel C Schroeder

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria GuschlbauerCenter for Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Alexandra C MaulCenter for Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Xiaowei YanDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Holger HerffDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Thorsten AnneckeDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Anja Sterner-KockCenter for Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Bernd W BöttigerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Daniel C SchroederDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
University Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypothermia is a severe, unpleasant side effect during general anesthesia. Thus, temperature surveillance is a prerequisite in general anesthesia settings during experimental surgeries. The gold standard to measure the core body temperature (Tcore) is placement of a Swan-Ganz catheter in the pulmonary artery, which is a highly invasive procedure. Therefore, Tcore is commonly examined in the urine bladder and rectum. However, these procedures are known for their inaccuracy and delayed record of temperatures. Zero-heat-flux (ZHF) thermometry is an alternative, non-invasive method quantifying Tcore in human patients by applying a thermosensoric patch to the lateral forehead. Since the porcine cranial anatomy is different to the human's, the optimal location of the patch remains unclear to date. The aim was to compare three different patch locations of ZHF thermometry in a porcine hypothermia model. Hypothermia (33.0 °C Tcore) was conducted in 11 anesthetized female pigs (26-30 kg). Tcore was measured continuously by an invasive Swan-Ganz catheter in the pulmonary artery (Tpulm). A ZHF thermometry device was mounted on three different defined locations. The smallest average difference between Tpulm and TZHF during stable temperatures was 0.21 ± 0.16 °C at location A, where the patch was placed directly behind the eye. Also during rapidly changing temperatures location A showed the smallest bias with 0.48 ± 0.29 °C. Location A provided the most reliable data for Tcore. Therefore, the ZHF thermometry patch should be placed directly behind the left temporal corner of the eye to provide a non-invasive method for accurate measurement of Tcore in pigs.

Indexed as

Body TemperatureAnalgesiaAnesthesiaAnimalsCatheterizationCatheterization, Swan-GanzDisease Models, AnimalFemaleForeheadHypothermiaPulmonary ArterySus scrofaThermometersThermometry

Identifiers

PMID26938613
PMCPMC4777531
OpenAlexW2292740073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.