ReviewBiosensors2016
Comparison of Electrochemical Immunosensors and Aptasensors for Detection of Small Organic Molecules in Environment, Food Safety, Clinical and Public Security.
Review in Biosensors, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrochemical and Bioelectrochemical Sensing Platforms for Diagnostics of COVID-19.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Systematic bio-fabrication of aptamers and their applications in engineering biology.Systems microbiology and biomanufacturing · 2023Review
- Recent advances in the potential applications of luminescence-based, SPR-based, and carbon-based biosensors.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Article
- Electrochemical Aptasensors Based on Hybrid Metal-Organic Frameworks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Aptasensors for Point-of-Care Detection of Small Molecules.Biosensors · 2020Review
- The Growing Interest in Development of Innovative Optical Aptasensors for the Detection of Antimicrobial Residues in Food Products.Biosensors · 2020Review
- Electrochemical Immunosensors for Antibiotic Detection.Biosensors · 2019Review
- Suppressing Non-Specific Binding of Proteins onto Electrode Surfaces in the Development of Electrochemical Immunosensors.Biosensors · 2019Review
- Oligonucleotide aptamers: promising and powerful diagnostic and therapeutic tools for infectious diseases.The Journal of infection · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We review here the most frequently reported targets among the electrochemical immunosensors and aptasensors: antibiotics, bisphenol A, cocaine, ochratoxin A and estradiol. In each case, the immobilization procedures are described as well as the transduction schemes and the limits of detection. It is shown that limits of detections are generally two to three orders of magnitude lower for immunosensors than for aptasensors, due to the highest affinities of antibodies. No significant progresses have been made to improve these affinities, but transduction schemes were improved instead, which lead to a regular improvement of the limit of detections corresponding to ca. five orders of magnitude over these last 10 years. These progresses depend on the target, however.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.