Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26938434›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Evaluating the Phylogenetic Status of the Extinct Japanese Otter on the Basis of Mitochondrial Genome Analysis.

Daisuke Waku, Takahiro Segawa, Takahiro Yonezawa, Ayumi Akiyoshi, Taichiro Ishige, Miya Ueda, Hiroshi Ogawa, Hiroshi Sasaki, Motokazu Ando, Naoki Kohno and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ancient DNA fromiScience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Analysis of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Daisuke WakuGraduate School of Human and Animal-Plant Relationships, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Funako, Atsugi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takahiro SegawaNational Institute of Polar Research, Midori-cho, Tachikawa-shi, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro YonezawaSchool of Life Sciences, Fudan University, SongHu Rd., Shanghai, China.
Ayumi AkiyoshiNational Institute of Polar Research, Midori-cho, Tachikawa-shi, Tokyo, Japan.
Taichiro IshigeNODAI Genome Research Center, Nodai Research Institute, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Sakuragaoka, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Miya UedaYokohama Zoological Gardens, Kamishirane-cho, Asahi-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hiroshi OgawaGraduate School of Human and Animal-Plant Relationships, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Funako, Atsugi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hiroshi SasakiDepartment of Contemporary Social Studies, Chikushi Jogakuen University, Ishizaka, Dazaifu, Fukuoka, Japan.
Motokazu AndoGraduate School of Human and Animal-Plant Relationships, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Funako, Atsugi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Naoki KohnoDepartment of Geology and Paleontology, National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo, Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Takeshi SasakiGraduate School of Human and Animal-Plant Relationships, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Funako, Atsugi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tokyo University of Agriculture · JPNational Institute of Polar Research · JPChikushi Jogakuen University · JPFudan University · CNNational Museum of Nature and Science · JPTokyo Zoological Park Society · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Japanese otter lived throughout four main Japanese islands, but it has not been observed in the wild since 1979 and was declared extinct in 2012. Although recent taxonomic and molecular phylogenetic studies suggest that it should be treated as an independent species, International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List considers it as subspecies of Lutra lutra. Therefore, the taxonomic status of this species needs to be resolved. Here we determined the complete mitochondrial genome of two Japanese otters caught in Kanagawa and Kochi prefectures and five Eurasian otters (L. lutra). We reconstructed a molecular phylogenetic tree to estimate the phylogenetic position of the Japanese otter in Lutrinae using the Japanese otters and the other 11 Lutrinae species on the basis of ND5 (692 bp) and cytochrome b (1,140 bp) sequences. We observed that the two Japanese otters had close relationships with Eurasian otters, forming a monophyletic group (100% bootstrap probability). To elucidate detailed phylogenetic relationships among the Japanese and Eurasian otters, we reconstructed a maximum likelihood tree according to mitochondrial genome sequences (14,740 bp). The Japanese otter (JO1) collected in Kanagawa was deeply nested in the Eurasian otter clade, whereas the Japanese otter (JO2) collected in Kochi formed a distinct independent lineage in the Lutra clade. The estimated molecular divergences time for the ancestral lineages of the Japanese otters was 0.10 Ma (95%: 0.06-0.16 Ma) and 1.27 Ma (95%: 0.98-1.59 Ma) for JO1 and JO2 lineages, respectively. Thus, JO1 was identified as a member of L. lutra; JO2 represented the old Japanese otter lineage, which may be a distinct new species or subspecies of Lutra. We suggest that the ancestral population of the JO2 lineage migrated to Japan via the land bridge that existed between western Japanese islands and Asian continent at 1.27 Ma.

Indexed as

Extinction, BiologicalGenome, MitochondrialPhylogenyAnimal MigrationAnimalsCytochromes bEuropeFemaleGenetic SpeciationGenetic VariationJapanMaleOttersPhylogeographyCytochromes b

Identifiers

PMID26938434
PMCPMC4777564
OpenAlexW2293164388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.