Observational studyMedicine2016
Determinants of Quality Care and Mortality for Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer in Virginia.
Observational study in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality indicators in surgical oncology: systematic review of measures used to compare quality across hospitals.BJS open · 2024Pooled it
- Timeliness of Primary Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer in Queensland: A 10 Year Rural-Urban Retrospective Cohort Study.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026Article
- The Relationship Between Travel Distance for Treatment and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy: A Systematic Review.Advances in radiation oncology · 2024Review
- Treatment of cervical cancer: overcoming challenges in access to brachytherapy.Expert review of anticancer therapy · 2022Review
- Factors Affecting Survival Outcome After Percutaneous Nephrostomy as Palliative Urinary Diversion in Obstructive Uropathy due to Advance Cervical Cancer Patients.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021Observational
- Latent composite indicators for evaluating adherence to guidelines in patients with a colorectal cancer diagnosis.Medicine · 2020Observational
- Cervical cancer outcome by type of health care facilities: National Cancer Database, 2004-2015.Cancer health disparities · 2020Article
- Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Vaginal Cancer and Its Precursors. Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 032/042, October 2018).Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2019Article
- Article
- [Substantial advantage of CT-planned HDR brachytherapy for cervical cancer patients compared to a historical series with regard to local control and toxicity?]Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2017Article
- The pervasive crisis of diminishing radiation therapy access for vulnerable populations in the United States-Part 4: Appalachian patients.Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
- Increasing age predicts poor cervical cancer prognosis with subsequent effect on treatment and overall survival.BrachytherapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Outcomes for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer are influenced by receipt of all indicated components of quality care: early diagnosis and receipt of external beam radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and brachytherapy. We performed an observational cohort study to evaluate receipt of quality cancer care and mortality after cancer diagnosis among patients with locally advanced cervical cancer in Virginia.We queried the Virginia state cancer registry to identify patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IB-IVA cervical cancer who were diagnosed during 2002 to 2012. We evaluated the influence of tumor-related, demographic, and geospatial factors on the receipt of indicated therapies and mortality. Treatment quality score of 0 to 3 was defined based upon the extent of receipt of the components of indicated therapy.A total of 1048 patients were identified; 33.1% received all 3 components of treatment and only 54.0% received brachytherapy. Predictors of higher quality score included younger age group versus 66+ years at diagnosis (18-42 odds ratio [OR] = 12.3, 95% confidence interval: 6.6, 23.0; 42-53 OR = 5.6, CI: 3.3, 9.5; 53-66 OR = 5.5, CI: 3.3, 9.1), lower tumor stages versus IVA (IB2 OR = 3.3, CI: 1.8, 6.2; II OR = 2.7, CI: 1.6, 4.5; IIIx OR = 2.1, CI: 1.3, 3.6), and treatment at a high-volume facility (OR 2.2, CI: 1.2, 4.2). Predictors of increased mortality included earlier year of diagnosis, higher tumor stage, treatment at a lower volume facility, and lower treatment quality score.In a cohort of locally advanced cervical cancer patients in Virginia, we identified a low rate of receipt of complete quality care for cervical cancer and a strong effect of facility volume on quality treatment and survival. Further research is needed to develop strategies to improve access to quality treatment and outcomes for cervical cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.