Observational studyMedicine2016
Breast-conserving Surgery Rates in Breast Cancer Patients With Different Molecular Subtypes: An Observational Study Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database.
Observational study in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intraoperative fluorescence imaging with aminolevulinic acid detects grossly occult breast cancer: a phase II randomized controlled trial.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2021Trial
- Early intervention with pulse dye and COLasers in medical science · 2019Trial
- Real-world characteristics and invasive disease-free survival of resected patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer: evidence from German population-based cancer registries.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- The Clinical Impact of Neoadjuvant Endocrine Treatment on Luminal-like Breast Cancers and Its Prognostic Significance: Results from a Single-Institution Prospective Cohort Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- A population-based comparison of treatment, resource utilization, and costs by cancer stage for Ontario patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2021Article
- A study of the dosimetric impact of daily setup variations measured with cone-beam CT on three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer delivered in the prone position.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2020Article
- What are the appropriate thresholds for High Quality Performance Indicators for breast surgery in Australia and New Zealand?Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2020Article
- Radical chest wall resection and modified reconstruction technique for solitary internal mammary lymph node recurrence in breast cancer.International journal of surgery case reports · 2019Article
- Surgical Outcomes of Primary Versus Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Breast Conservation Surgery: A Comparative Study from a Developing Country.World journal of surgery · 2018Article
- Use of trastuzumab as an adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer in China: The Nvwa study.Medicine · 2018Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to compare breast-conserving surgery (BCS) rates across patients with different molecular subtypes.We identified female breast cancer patients who were diagnosed between 2010 and 2012 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patients without available critical clinicopathological information were excluded. The chi-square test and logistic regression analysis were used to investigate factors associated with BCS.This study identified 85,415 T1-2N0-3M0 breast cancer patients. Among the patients with HR+/HER2-, HR+/HER2+, HR-/HER2+, and HR-/HER2- diseases, 63.5% (38,823/61,142), 51.2% (4850/9473), 43.2% (1740/4030), and 55.7% (6000/10,770), respectively, received BCS (P < 0.01). Patients with HR-/HER2+ (odds ratio 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.62) disease were significantly less likely to receive BCS than patients with HR+/HER2- disease after adjustment for T-stage, N-stage, age, tumor grade, county type, and race. Differences in BCS rates between the HR+/HER2- and HR-/HER2+ subgroups were 29.1%, 14.0%, 10.1%, 8.5%, and 0.2% in patients with tumor sizes <10 mm, 10 to 20 mm, 20 to 30 mm, 30 to 40 mm, and 40 to 50 mm, respectively. Differences in BCS rates between the HR+/HER2- and HR-/HER2+ subgroups were 20.3% and 5.7% in node-negative and node-positive patients, respectively. BCS rates in patients with grades I, II, and III tumors in the HR+/HER2- and HR-/HER2+ subgroups were 72.2% and 34.6%, 62.7% and 42.3%, and 54.7% and 43.4%, respectively.Our study demonstrated that BCS rates varied significantly across molecular subtypes, especially in patients with lower tumor burden. HR+/HER2- and HR-/HER2+ patients exhibited the highest and lowest BCS rates, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.