ArticlePloS one2016
Pitfalls of DNA Quantification Using DNA-Binding Fluorescent Dyes and Suggested Solutions.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
71 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid fermentation and an adapted cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method enable sequencing-grade DNA extraction from Phanerodontia australis.Folia microbiologica · 2026Article
- High-quality metagenome-assembled genomes of carbon-degrading, sulfate-reducing, and sulfur-oxidizing Acidobacteriota from Sub-Antarctic Marion Island soils.Microbiology resource announcements · 2026Article
- Dimethylsulfoniopropionate metabolism shapes microbial ecology and physiological adaptation during the austral winter in Southern Ocean sea ice and seawater.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Genomic evidence reveals taxonomic oversplitting in a wing dimorphic grasshopper complex Tetrix japonica.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Complete Mitochondrial Genomes of Two Species of the GenusAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Whole-genome analysis reveals the growth-promoting and biocontrol potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Ba. YN.J3 isolated from Avena Sativa.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- A Simplified and Efficient Protocol for DNA Isolation from Deer Antlers and Prepared Trophy Skulls.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Assessment of radiotherapy effect and toxicity using tissue-associated DNA methylation markers in cell-free DNA: a study on prostate cancer.Radiation and environmental biophysics · 2026Article
- Comparative assessment of SNP genotyping assays for challenging forensic samples utilizing ancient DNA methods.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Determination of residual DNA in decellularised aortas- towards fluorescence-based quantification of DNA purified by various methods.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- Plasmid Library Construction From Genomic DNA.Current protocols · 2025Article
- Article
- The first complete mitochondrial genome ofFrontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Article
- Optimising recovery of DNA from minimally invasive sampling methods: Efficacy of buccal swabs, preservation strategy and DNA extraction approaches for amphibian studies.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Quantitative Analysis of Genomic DNA Degradation ofGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Comparison between next-generation sequencing and multiplex polymerase chain reaction assays for nonsmall-cell lung cancer molecular diagnosis.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- A digital PCR approach to assess the purity of oregano.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Clinical validation of RCSMS: A rapid and sensitive CRISPR-Cas12a test for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 from saliva.PloS one · 2024Article
- DNA Isolation Long-Read Genomic Sequencing in Ctenophores.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Qubit fluorometer is a DNA quantification device based on the fluorescence intensity of fluorescent dye binding to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). Qubit is generally considered useful for checking DNA quality before next-generation sequencing because it measures intact dsDNA. To examine the most accurate and suitable methods for quantifying DNA for quality assessment, we compared three quantification methods: NanoDrop, which measures UV absorbance; Qubit; and quantitative PCR (qPCR), which measures the abundance of a target gene. For the comparison, we used three types of DNA: 1) DNA extracted from fresh frozen liver tissues (Frozen-DNA); 2) DNA extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded liver tissues comparable to those used for Frozen-DNA (FFPE-DNA); and 3) DNA extracted from the remaining fractions after RNA extraction with Trizol reagent (Trizol-DNA). These DNAs were serially diluted with distilled water and measured using three quantification methods. For Frozen-DNA, the Qubit values were not proportional to the dilution ratio, in contrast with the NanoDrop and qPCR values. This non-proportional decrease in Qubit values was dependent on a lower salt concentration, and over 1 mM NaCl in the DNA solution was required for the Qubit measurement. For FFPE-DNA, the Qubit values were proportional to the dilution ratio and were lower than the NanoDrop values. However, electrophoresis revealed that qPCR reflected the degree of DNA fragmentation more accurately than Qubit. Thus, qPCR is superior to Qubit for checking the quality of FFPE-DNA. For Trizol-DNA, the Qubit values were proportional to the dilution ratio and were consistently lower than the NanoDrop values, similar to FFPE-DNA. However, the qPCR values were higher than the NanoDrop values. Electrophoresis with SYBR Green I and single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) quantification demonstrated that Trizol-DNA consisted mostly of non-fragmented ssDNA. Therefore, Qubit is not always the most accurate method for quantifying DNA available for PCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.