Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26937644›Full record

ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2016

A Historical Overview of the Classification, Evolution, and Dispersion of Leishmania Parasites and Sandflies.

Mohammad Akhoundi, Katrin Kuhls, Arnaud Cannet, Jan Votýpka, Pierre Marty, Pascal Delaunay, Denis Sereno

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 448 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
448citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
70.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

448 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 994 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. LABCG1 AffectsACS infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

388 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohammad AkhoundiService de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Hôpital de l'Archet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.
Katrin KuhlsDivision of Molecular Biotechnology and Functional Genetics, Technical University of Applied Sciences Wildau, Wildau, Germany.
Arnaud CannetInserm U1065, Centre Méditerranéen de Médecine Moléculaire, Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France.
Jan VotýpkaBiology Centre, Institute of Parasitology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pierre MartyService de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Hôpital de l'Archet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.
Pascal DelaunayService de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Hôpital de l'Archet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.
Denis SerenoMIVEGEC, UMR CNRS-IRD-Université de Montpellier Centre IRD, Montpellier, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRCentre Méditerranéen de Médecine Moléculaire · FRCentre Occitanie-Montpellier · FRHôpital l'Archet · FRInserm · FRInstitute of Parasitology · CZTechnical University of Applied Sciences Wildau · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study is to describe the major evolutionary historical events among Leishmania, sandflies, and the associated animal reservoirs in detail, in accordance with the geographical evolution of the Earth, which has not been previously discussed on a large scale. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL

findingsLeishmania and sandfly classification has always been a controversial matter, and the increasing number of species currently described further complicates this issue. Despite several hypotheses on the origin, evolution, and distribution of Leishmania and sandflies in the Old and New World, no consistent agreement exists regarding dissemination of the actors that play roles in leishmaniasis. For this purpose, we present here three centuries of research on sandflies and Leishmania descriptions, as well as a complete description of Leishmania and sandfly fossils and the emergence date of each Leishmania and sandfly group during different geographical periods, from 550 million years ago until now. We discuss critically the different approaches that were used for Leishmana and sandfly classification and their synonymies, proposing an updated classification for each species of Leishmania and sandfly. We update information on the current distribution and dispersion of different species of Leishmania (53), sandflies (more than 800 at genus or subgenus level), and animal reservoirs in each of the following geographical ecozones: Palearctic, Nearctic, Neotropic, Afrotropical, Oriental, Malagasy, and Australian. We propose an updated list of the potential and proven sandfly vectors for each Leishmania species in the Old and New World. Finally, we address a classical question about digenetic Leishmania evolution: which was the first host, a vertebrate or an invertebrate? CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: We propose an updated view of events that have played important roles in the geographical dispersion of sandflies, in relation to both the Leishmania species they transmit and the animal reservoirs of the parasites.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsDisease ReservoirsFossilsHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHistory, AncientInsect VectorsLeishmaniaLeishmaniasisPsychodidae

Identifiers

PMID26937644
PMCPMC4777430
OpenAlexW2296520086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.