Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26937425›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of radiology open2014

MR-PET of the body: Early experience and insights.

Miguel Ramalho, Mamdoh AlObaidy, Onofrio A Catalano, Alexander R Guimaraes, Marco Salvatore, Richard C Semelka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of radiology open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Miguel RamalhoDepartment of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Mamdoh AlObaidyDepartment of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Onofrio A CatalanoDepartment of Radiology, SDN-IRCCS and University of Naples "Parthenope", Naples, Italy.
Alexander R GuimaraesDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Marco SalvatoreDepartment of Radiology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Richard C SemelkaDepartment of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MR-PET is a novel imaging modality that combines anatomic and metabolic data acquisition, allowing for simultaneous depiction of morphological and functional abnormalities with an excellent soft tissue contrast and good spatial resolution; as well as accurate temporal and spatial image fusion; while substantially reducing radiation dose when compared with PET-CT. In this review, we will discuss MR-PET basic principles and technical challenges and limitations, explore some practical considerations, and cover the main clinical applications, while shedding some light on some of the future trends regarding this new imaging technique.

Indexed as

MRIMR-PETPETPET-CTWhole-body imaging

Identifiers

PMID26937425
PMCPMC4750620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.