Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26937177›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2016

How effective is an in-hospital heart failure self-care program in a Japanese setting? Lessons from a randomized controlled pilot study.

Naoko P Kato, Koichiro Kinugawa, Miho Sano, Asuka Kogure, Fumika Sakuragi, Kihoko Kobukata, Hiroshi Ohtsu, Sanae Wakita, Tiny Jaarsma, Keiko Kazuma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Disease management interventions for heart failure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Naoko P KatoDepartment of Therapeutic Strategy for Heart Failure, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Social and Welfare Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; JSPS Postdoctoral Fellow for Research Abroad, Tokyo, Japan.
Koichiro KinugawaDepartment of Therapeutic Strategy for Heart Failure, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Miho SanoDepartment of Nursing, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Asuka KogureDepartment of Nursing, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Fumika SakuragiDepartment of Pharmacy, The University of Tokyo Hospital, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kihoko KobukataDepartment of Nursing, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi OhtsuDepartment of Clinical Data Management, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Sanae WakitaDepartment of Nursing, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tiny JaarsmaDepartment of Social and Welfare Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Keiko KazumaDepartment of Adult Nursing, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPLinköping University · SEUniversity of Tokyo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the effectiveness of heart failure (HF) disease management programs has been established in Western countries, to date there have been no such programs in Japan. These programs may have different effectiveness due to differences in health care organization and possible cultural differences with regard to self-care. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a pilot HF program in a Japanese setting.

methodsWe developed an HF program focused on enhancing patient self-care before hospital discharge. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive the new HF program or usual care. The primary outcome was self-care behavior as assessed by the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale (EHFScBS). Secondary outcomes included HF knowledge and the 2-year rate of HF hospitalization and/or cardiac death.

resultsA total of 32 patients were enrolled (mean age, 63 years; 31% female). There was no difference in the total score of the EHFScBS between the two groups. One specific behavior score regarding a low-salt diet significantly improved compared with baseline in the intervention group. HF knowledge in the intervention group tended to improve more over 6 months than in the control group (a group-by-time effect, F=2.47, P=0.098). During a 2-year follow-up, the HF program was related to better outcomes regarding HF hospitalization and/or cardiac death (14% vs 48%, log-rank test P=0.04). In Cox regression analysis after adjustment for age, sex, and logarithmic of B-type natriuretic peptide, the program was associated with a reduction in HF hospitalization and/or cardiac death (hazard ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.90; P=0.04).

conclusionThe HF program was likely to increase patients' HF knowledge, change their behavior regarding a low-salt diet, and reduce HF hospitalization and/or cardiac events. Further improvement focused on the transition of knowledge to self-care behavior is necessary.

Indexed as

discharge educationdisease managementhospitalizationknowledgenursingpatient education

Identifiers

PMID26937177
PMCPMC4762442
OpenAlexW2284909470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.