Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26937044›Full record

ArticleJournal of mammalogy2015

Social affiliation and contact patterns among white-tailed deer in disparate landscapes: implications for disease transmission.

Eric M Schauber, Clayton K Nielsen, Lene J Kjær, Charles W Anderson, Daniel J Storm

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mammalogy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. SARS-CoV-2 exposure in wild white-tailed deer (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric M SchauberCooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory, Southern Illinois University (Mail Code 6504) , Carbondale, IL 62901 , USA (EMS, CKN, LJK, CWA, DJS ).
Clayton K NielsenCooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory, Southern Illinois University (Mail Code 6504) , Carbondale, IL 62901 , USA (EMS, CKN, LJK, CWA, DJS ).
Lene J KjærCooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory, Southern Illinois University (Mail Code 6504) , Carbondale, IL 62901 , USA (EMS, CKN, LJK, CWA, DJS ).
Charles W AndersonCooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory, Southern Illinois University (Mail Code 6504) , Carbondale, IL 62901 , USA (EMS, CKN, LJK, CWA, DJS ).
Daniel J StormCooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory, Southern Illinois University (Mail Code 6504) , Carbondale, IL 62901 , USA (EMS, CKN, LJK, CWA, DJS ).
Southern Illinois University Carbondale · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In social species, individuals contact members of the same group much more often than those of other groups, particularly for contacts that could directly transmit disease agents. This disparity in contact rates violates the assumptions of simple disease models, hinders disease spread between groups, and could decouple disease transmission from population density. Social behavior of white-tailed deer has important implications for the long-term dynamics and impact of diseases such as bovine tuberculosis and chronic wasting disease (CWD), so expanding our understanding of their social system is important. White-tailed deer form matrilineal groups, which inhabit stable home ranges that overlap somewhat with others-a pattern intermediate between mass-action and strict territoriality. To quantify how group membership affects their contact rates and document the spectrum of social affiliation, we analyzed location data from global positioning system (GPS) collars on female and juvenile white-tailed deer in 2 study areas: near Carbondale in forest-dominated southern Illinois (2002-2006) and near Lake Shelbyville in agriculture-dominated central Illinois (2006-2009). For each deer dyad (i.e., 2 individual deer with sufficient overlapping GPS data), we measured space-use overlap, correlation of movements, direct contact rate (simultaneous GPS locations < 10 m apart), and indirect contact rate (GPS locations < 10 m apart when offset by 1 or 3 days). Direct contact rates were substantially higher for within-group dyads than between-group dyads, but group membership had little apparent effect on indirect contact rates. The group membership effect on direct contact rates was strongest in winter and weakest in summer, with no apparent difference between study areas. Social affiliations were not dichotomous, with some deer dyads showing loose but positive affiliation. Even for obvious within-group dyads, their strength of affiliation fluctuated between years, seasons, and even days. Our findings highlight the poor fit between deer behavior and simple models of disease transmission and, combined with previous infection data, suggest that direct contact is the primary driver of CWD transmission among free-living female and juvenile white-tailed deer.

Indexed as

contactdiseaseglobal positioning systemgroupIllinoislandscapeOdocoileus virginianustransmissionwhite-tailed deer

Identifiers

PMID26937044
PMCPMC4668922
OpenAlexW1968473044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.