Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26937012›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Auditory Cortical Frequency Processing.

Magnus J Teschner, Bryan A Seybold, Brian J Malone, Jana Hüning, Christoph E Schreiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. [Evolution of auditory response signal-to-noise ratio in ascending auditory pathways].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2021
    Article
  8. [Effects of background noise on auditory response characteristics of primary auditory cortex neurons in awake mice].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2021
    Article
  9. Altered Response Dynamics and Increased Population Correlation to Tonal Stimuli Embedded in Noise in Aging Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Endogenous Cholinergic Signaling Modulates Sound-Evoked Responses of the Medial Nucleus of the Trapezoid Body.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  12. Listening in complex acoustic scenes.Current opinion in physiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Magnus J TeschnerColeman Memorial Laboratory for Auditory Neuroscience, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, and Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hannover Medical School, D-30625 Hannover, Germany.
Bryan A SeyboldColeman Memorial Laboratory for Auditory Neuroscience, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, and.
Brian J MaloneColeman Memorial Laboratory for Auditory Neuroscience, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, and.
Jana HüningDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hannover Medical School, D-30625 Hannover, Germany.
Christoph E SchreinerColeman Memorial Laboratory for Auditory Neuroscience, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, and chris@phy.ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4571-4328

Funding

FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION OF PRIMARY AUDITORY CORTEXR01DC002260 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SCHREINER, CHRISTOPH E. · 1995 to 2020
$9.2M
Nonlinear dynamics of complex sound processing in auditory cortexR01DC011843 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MALONE, BRIAN J. · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
The role of dendrite-targeting interneurons in auditory cortexF31DC012719 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SEYBOLD, BRYAN · 2013 to 2014
$71k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC012719NIDCD NIH HHS F31-DC-012719NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002260NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC-002260NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011843NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC-011843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neural mechanisms that support the robust processing of acoustic signals in the presence of background noise in the auditory system remain largely unresolved. Psychophysical experiments have shown that signal detection is influenced by the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the overall stimulus level, but this relationship has not been fully characterized. We evaluated the neural representation of frequency in rat primary auditory cortex by constructing tonal frequency response areas (FRAs) in primary auditory cortex for different SNRs, tone levels, and noise levels. We show that response strength and selectivity for frequency and sound level depend on interactions between SNRs and tone levels. At low SNRs, jointly increasing the tone and noise levels reduced firing rates and narrowed FRA bandwidths; at higher SNRs, however, increasing the tone and noise levels increased firing rates and expanded bandwidths, as is usually seen for FRAs obtained without background noise. These changes in frequency and intensity tuning decreased tone level and tone frequency discriminability at low SNRs. By contrast, neither response onset latencies nor noise-driven steady-state firing rates meaningfully interacted with SNRs or overall sound levels. Speech detection performance in humans was also shown to depend on the interaction between overall sound level and SNR. Together, these results indicate that signal processing difficulties imposed by high noise levels are quite general and suggest that the neurophysiological changes we see for simple sounds generalize to more complex stimuli. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Effective processing of sounds in background noise is an important feature of the mammalian auditory system and a necessary feature for successful hearing in many listening conditions. Even mild hearing loss strongly affects this ability in humans, seriously degrading the ability to communicate. The mechanisms involved in achieving high performance in background noise are not well understood. We investigated the effects of SNR and overall stimulus level on the frequency tuning of neurons in rat primary auditory cortex. We found that the effects of noise on frequency selectivity are not determined solely by the SNR but depend also on the levels of the foreground tones and background noise. These observations can lead to improvement in therapeutic approaches for hearing-impaired patients.

Indexed as

Signal-To-Noise RatioAcoustic StimulationAction PotentialsAdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionAuditory ThresholdFemaleHumansMalePsychoacousticsStatistics, NonparametricYoung Adultauditoryhearingneurophysiologynoisepsychophysicsspeech

Identifiers

PMID26937012
PMCPMC4879216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.