Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26936888›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2016

Signs and symptoms associated with early pregnancy loss: findings from a population-based preconception cohort.

K J Sapra, G M Buck Louis, R Sundaram, K S Joseph, L M Bates, S Galea, C V Ananth

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Diagnosis and management of early pregnancy loss.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

K J SapraDivision of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Rockville, MD, USA Department of Epidemiology, Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA saprakj@mail.nih.gov.
G M Buck LouisDivision of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Rockville, MD, USA.
R SundaramDivision of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Rockville, MD, USA.
K S JosephDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, The Children's and Women's Hospital of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
L M BatesDepartment of Epidemiology, Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
S GaleaDepartment of Epidemiology, Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
C V AnanthDepartment of Epidemiology, Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University · USEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · USBoston University · USChildren's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia · CA

Funding

DETERMINANTS OF MALE AND FEMALE FECUNDITY AND FERTILITY RESEARCH SITES-275033356N01HD033356 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · 2004 to 2005
–
DETERMINANTS OF MALE AND FEMALE FECUNDITY AND FERTILITY DATA COORDINAT-275033358N01HD033358 · NICHD · THE EMMES CORPORATION · 2004 to 2005
–
Intramural NIH HHSNICHD NIH HHS N01-HD-3-3355NICHD NIH HHS N01-HD-3-3356NICHD NIH HHS N01-HD-3-3358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionWhat is the relationship between signs and symptoms of early pregnancy and pregnancy loss <20 weeks' gestation? SUMMARY ANSWER: Vaginal bleeding is associated with increased incidence of early pregnancy loss, with more severe bleeding and bleeding accompanied by lower abdominal cramping associated with greater incidence of loss; conversely, vomiting is associated with decreased incidence of early pregnancy loss, even in the setting of vaginal bleeding, while nausea alone is not. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Two previous cohort studies with preconception enrollment suggested that bleeding is associated with loss while nausea is inversely associated with loss though these studies were limited by small study size and reporting after loss ascertainment. No prior preconception cohort study has examined multiple signs and symptoms in relation to pregnancy loss. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Population-based preconception cohort of 501 couples discontinuing contraception to try for pregnancy in 16 counties in Michigan and Texas, USA. Participants were followed daily until positive home pregnancy test or 12 months of trying without an hCG pregnancy; women who became pregnant were followed daily from 2 to 7 weeks post-conception. PARTICIPANTS, SETTING,

methodsThree hundred and forty-seven women had a positive home pregnancy test denoting hCG pregnancy. Three hundred and forty-one women remained after excluding ineligible pregnancies. Women recorded daily from 2 to 7 weeks post-conception their signs and symptoms, including vaginal bleeding (none, spotting, light, moderate and heavy), lower abdominal cramping, nausea and vomiting. Pregnancy losses were ascertained by a subsequent negative home pregnancy test, clinical confirmation or onset of menses, depending on gestational age at loss; time-to-loss was measured in days post-conception. Cumulative incidence functions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were constructed for each sign or symptom, and hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for presence compared with absence of signs or symptoms were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Women experienced lower abdominal cramping (85%), nausea (48%), vomiting (46%) and light/moderate/heavy vaginal bleeding (24%) during early pregnancy. Ninety-five (28%) women experienced a loss. Cumulative incidence of pregnancy loss varied by symptomatology: 19% for vomiting, 27% for lower abdominal cramping, 35% for nausea only, 52% for vaginal bleeding, 81% for vaginal bleeding with lower abdominal cramping. Incidence of pregnancy loss was increased among women with vaginal bleeding (HR: 3.62, 95% CI: 2.29-5.74) and among women with vaginal bleeding and lower abdominal cramping (HR: 5.03, 95% CI: 2.07-12.20). Incidence of pregnancy loss was decreased for women with vomiting (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.30-0.86). In the setting of vaginal bleeding with lower abdominal cramping, vomiting reduced the incidence of pregnancy loss (HR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.11-0.56). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: There were few losses beyond 14 weeks gestation; thus, the precision of our findings related to losses occurring after the first trimester is limited. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsBy using sensitive home pregnancy tests, we are able to document and characterize the cumulative incidence of the earliest pregnancy losses, which constitute the majority of losses. The use of daily, prospective capture of signs and symptoms relative to ascertainment of pregnancy loss minimizes potential biases associated with reporting after rather than before a loss, which could potentially distort the relationship between signs and symptoms and pregnancy loss. The findings of our study suggest that it may be useful to develop prognostic models for pregnancy loss based on signs and symptoms. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health (contract numbers N01-HD-3-3355; N01-HD-3-3356; N01-HD-3-3358). The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Indexed as

Abdominal PainAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesFemaleFetal ResorptionHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMichiganNauseaPregnancyPrevalenceProspective StudiesRiskSeverity of Illness Indexbleedingcrampingmiscarriagenauseapregnancy lossprospective cohort studiessignssymptomsthreatened abortionvomiting

Identifiers

PMID26936888
PMCPMC4791918
OpenAlexW2304256873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.