Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26936852›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2016

Prognostic value of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stages 0 and A hepatocellular carcinomas: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Seung Hyup Hyun, Jae Seon Eo, Jeong Won Lee, Joon Young Choi, Kyung-Han Lee, Sae Jung Na, Il Ki Hong, Jin Kyoung Oh, Yong An Chung, Bong-Il Song and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Prognostic values of ALDOB expression andFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
  10. Metabolic tumour volume onScientific reports · 2021
    Article
  11. KSNM60 in Clinical Nuclear Oncology.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Prognostic value ofCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2020
    Article
  14. Liver cancer · 2020
    Article
  15. Prognostic value ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Article
  16. Emerging role ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
  17. Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Seung Hyup HyunDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae Seon EoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jeong Won LeeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Joon Young ChoiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyung-Han LeeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sae Jung NaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Il Ki HongDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jin Kyoung OhDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Yong An ChungDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Bong-Il SongDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Sung KimDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Kyung Sik KimDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dae Hyuk MoonDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Republic of Korea. dhmoon@amc.seoul.kr.
Mijin YunDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Republic of Korea. yunmijin@yuhs.ac.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe evaluated the prognostic value of pretreatment (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0 or A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had received curative treatment or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

methodsBetween 2009 and 2010, 317 patients diagnosed with HCC at seven hospitals were enrolled. Among these, 195 patients underwent curative treatments including resection, liver transplantation, and radiofrequency ablation. TACE was performed in 122 patients. The tumor-to-normal liver standardized uptake value ratio (TLR) of the primary tumor was measured using pretreatment FDG PET/CT. The prognostic significance of TLR and other clinical variables was assessed using Cox regression models. Differences in the overall survival (OS) associated with TLR or other significant clinical factors were examined using the Kaplan-Meier method.

resultsOver a median follow-up period of 46 months, 77 patients died from cancer. In the curative cohort, higher TLR (≥2) was significantly associated with death (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.68; 95 % CI, 1.16-6.15; P = 0.020) in multivariable analysis. Patients with a higher TLR had significantly worse OS than patients with a lower TLR (5-year overall survival, 61 % vs. 79.4 %; P = 0.006). In the TACE cohort, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (≥8) was a significant independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 3.34; 95 % CI, 1.49-7.48; P = 0.003), whereas TLR was not associated with OS. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed significantly poorer OS in patients with higher MELD scores (≥8) than in those with lower MELD scores (5-year survival rate, 33.1 % vs. 79.6 %; P < 0.001).

conclusionsPretreatment TLR measured using FDG PET/CT was an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with BCLC stage 0 or A HCC undergoing curative treatment. In contrast, underlying liver function appeared to be important in predicting the prognosis of patients undergoing TACE.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAgedBiological TransportCarcinoma, HepatocellularCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesFluorodeoxyglucose F18FDG PET/CTHepatocellular carcinomaMulticenter trialPrognosisStandardized uptake value

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.