ArticleMedical physics2016
A Bayesian spatial temporal mixtures approach to kinetic parametric images in dynamic positron emission tomography.
Article in Medical physics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parametric imaging of dynamic long-axial-field-of-view PET scans: Technical challenges, statistical insights and clinical applications.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026Review
- Mathematical Models for FDG Kinetics in Cancer: A Review.Metabolites · 2021Review
- Efficient DCE-MRI Parameter and Uncertainty Estimation Using a Neural Network.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2020Article
- Spatial and spatio-temporal statistical analyses of retinal images: a review of methods and applications.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeEstimation of parametric maps is challenging for kinetic models in dynamic positron emission tomography. Since voxel kinetics tend to be spatially contiguous, the authors consider groups of homogeneous voxels together. The authors propose a novel algorithm to identify the groups and estimate kinetic parameters simultaneously. Uncertainty estimates for kinetic parameters are also obtained.
methodsMixture models were used to fit the time activity curves. In order to borrow information from spatially nearby voxels, the Potts model was adopted. A spatial temporal model was built incorporating both spatial and temporal information in the data. Markov chain Monte Carlo was used to carry out parameter estimation. Evaluation and comparisons with existing methods were carried out on cardiac studies using both simulated data sets and a pig study data. One-compartment kinetic modeling was used, in which K1 is the parameter of interest, providing a measure of local perfusion.
resultsBased on simulation experiments, the median standard deviation across all image voxels, of K1 estimates were 0, 0.13, and 0.16 for the proposed spatial mixture models (SMMs), standard curve fitting, and spatial K-means methods, respectively. The corresponding median mean squared biases for K1 were 0.04, 0.06, and 0.06 for abnormal region of interest (ROI); 0.03, 0.03, and 0.04 for normal ROI; and 0.007, 0.02, and 0.05 for the noise region.
conclusionsSMM is a fully Bayesian algorithm which determines the optimal number of homogeneous voxel groups, voxel group membership, parameter estimation, and parameter uncertainty estimation simultaneously. The voxel membership can also be used for classification purposes. By borrowing information from spatially nearby voxels, SMM substantially reduces the variability of parameter estimates. In some ROIs, SMM also reduces mean squared bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.