Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26936614›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2016

Serum protein electrophoresis: an interesting diagnosis tool to distinguish viral from bacterial community-acquired pneumonia.

B Davido, C Badr, A Lagrange, S Makhloufi, P De Truchis, C Perronne, J Salomon, A Dinh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B DavidoMaladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Universitaire Raymond-Poincaré, AP-HP, Garches, France. benjamin.davido@gmail.com.
C BadrMaladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Universitaire Raymond-Poincaré, AP-HP, Garches, France.
A LagrangeMaladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Universitaire Raymond-Poincaré, AP-HP, Garches, France.
S MakhloufiMaladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Universitaire Raymond-Poincaré, AP-HP, Garches, France.
P De TruchisMaladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Universitaire Raymond-Poincaré, AP-HP, Garches, France.
C PerronneMaladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Universitaire Raymond-Poincaré, AP-HP, Garches, France.
J SalomonMaladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Universitaire Raymond-Poincaré, AP-HP, Garches, France.
A DinhMaladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Universitaire Raymond-Poincaré, AP-HP, Garches, France.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHôpital Raymond-Poincaré · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

29-69 % of pneumonias are microbiologically documented because it can be considered as an invasive procedure with variable test sensitivity. However, it drastically impacts therapeutic strategy in particular the use of antibiotics. Serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) is a routine and non-invasive test commonly used to identify serum protein disorders. As virus and bacteria may induce different globulins production, we hypothesize that SPEP can be used as an etiological diagnosis test. Retrospective study conducted from 1/1/13 until 5/1/15 among patient hospitalized for an acute community-acquired pneumonia based on fever, crackles and radiological abnormalities. α/β, α/γ, β/γ globulins and albumin/globulin (A/G) ratio were calculated from SPEP. Data were analyzed in 3 groups: documented viral (DVP) or bacterial pneumonia (DBP) and supposedly bacterial pneumonia (SBP). We used ANOVA statistic test with multiple comparisons using CI95 and ROC curve to compare them. 109 patients included divided into DBP (n = 16), DVP (n = 26) and SBP (n = 67). Mean age was 62 ± 18 year-old with a sex ratio M/F of 1.3. Underlying conditions (e.g. COPD, diabetes) were comparable between groups in multivariate analysis. Means of A/G ratio were 0.80 [0.76-0.84], 0.96 [0.91-1.01], 1.08 [0.99-1.16] respectively for DBP, SBP and DVP (p = 0.0002). A/G ratio cut-off value of 0.845 has a sensitivity of 87.5 % and a specificity of 73.1 %. A/G ratio seems to be an easy diagnostic tool to differentiate bacterial from viral pneumonia. A/G ratio cut-off value below 0.845 seems to be predictable of a bacterial origin and support the use of antibiotics.

Indexed as

Blood ProteinsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCommunity-Acquired InfectionsComorbidityDiagnosis, DifferentialElectrophoresisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPneumonia, BacterialPneumonia, ViralBiomarkersBlood Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26936614
OpenAlexW2288598697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.