ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2016
Selecting the embryo with the highest implantation potential using a data mining based prediction model.
Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond integration: towards benchmarks for developmental potential in human stem cell-derived embryo models.Human reproduction update · 2026Review
- Zygote Diameter and Total Cytoplasmic Volume as Useful Predictive Tools of Blastocyst Quality.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2023Article
- The Future Is Coming: Artificial Intelligence in the Treatment of Infertility Could Improve Assisted Reproduction Outcomes-The Value of Regulatory Frameworks.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Article
- A Review of Machine Learning Approaches in Assisted Reproductive Technologies.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2019Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Grading Quality of Bovine Blastocyst Digital Images: Direct Capture with Juxtaposed Lenses of Smartphone Camera and Stereomicroscope Ocular Lens.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Methods for assessing the quality of mammalian embryos: How far we are from the gold standard?JBRA assisted reproduction · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmbryo selection has been based on developmental and morphological characteristics. However, the presence of an important intra-and inter-observer variability of standard scoring system (SSS) has been reported. A computer-assisted scoring system (CASS) has the potential to overcome most of these disadvantages associated with the SSS. The aims of this study were to construct a prediction model, with data mining approaches, and compare the predictive performance of models in SSS and CASS and to evaluate whether using the prediction model would impact the selection of the embryo for transfer.
methodsA total of 871 single transferred embryos between 2008 and 2013 were included and evaluated with two scoring systems: SSS and CASS. Prediction models were developed using multivariable logistic regression (LR) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS). The prediction models were externally validated with a test set of 109 single transfers between January and June 2014. Area under the curve (AUC) in training data and validation data was compared to determine the utility of the models.
resultsIn SSS models, the AUC declined significantly from training data to validation data (p < 0.05). No significant difference was detected in CASS derived models. Two final prediction models derived from CASS were obtained using LR and MARS, which showed moderate discriminative capacity (c-statistic 0.64 and 0.69 respectively) on validation data.
conclusionsThe study showed that the introduction of CASS improved the generalizability of the prediction models, and the combination of computer-assisted scoring system with data mining based predictive modeling is a promising approach to improve the selection of embryo with the highest implantation potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.