Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26936606›Full record

ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2016

Selecting the embryo with the highest implantation potential using a data mining based prediction model.

Fang Chen, Diane De Neubourg, Sophie Debrock, Karen Peeraer, Thomas D'Hooghe, Carl Spiessens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A Review of Machine Learning Approaches in Assisted Reproductive Technologies.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fang ChenLeuven University Fertility Centre, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium. fang.chen@uzlevuen.be.
Diane De NeubourgUZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium. Diane.DeNeubourg@uza.be.
Sophie DebrockLeuven University Fertility Centre, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium. sophie.debrock@uzleuven.be.
Karen PeeraerLeuven University Fertility Centre, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium. karen.peeraer@uzleuven.be.
Thomas D'HoogheLeuven University Fertility Centre, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium. Thomas.dhooghe@med.kuleuven.be.
Carl SpiessensLeuven University Fertility Centre, UZ Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium. carl.spiessens@uzleuven.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmbryo selection has been based on developmental and morphological characteristics. However, the presence of an important intra-and inter-observer variability of standard scoring system (SSS) has been reported. A computer-assisted scoring system (CASS) has the potential to overcome most of these disadvantages associated with the SSS. The aims of this study were to construct a prediction model, with data mining approaches, and compare the predictive performance of models in SSS and CASS and to evaluate whether using the prediction model would impact the selection of the embryo for transfer.

methodsA total of 871 single transferred embryos between 2008 and 2013 were included and evaluated with two scoring systems: SSS and CASS. Prediction models were developed using multivariable logistic regression (LR) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS). The prediction models were externally validated with a test set of 109 single transfers between January and June 2014. Area under the curve (AUC) in training data and validation data was compared to determine the utility of the models.

resultsIn SSS models, the AUC declined significantly from training data to validation data (p < 0.05). No significant difference was detected in CASS derived models. Two final prediction models derived from CASS were obtained using LR and MARS, which showed moderate discriminative capacity (c-statistic 0.64 and 0.69 respectively) on validation data.

conclusionsThe study showed that the introduction of CASS improved the generalizability of the prediction models, and the combination of computer-assisted scoring system with data mining based predictive modeling is a promising approach to improve the selection of embryo with the highest implantation potential.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesEmbryo ImplantationAdultArea Under CurveData MiningEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMaternal AgeMultivariate AnalysisPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID26936606
PMCPMC4776393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.