Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26936369›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2016

Express photolithographic DNA microarray synthesis with optimized chemistry and high-efficiency photolabile groups.

Matej Sack, Kathrin Hölz, Ann-Katrin Holik, Nicole Kretschy, Veronika Somoza, Klaus-Peter Stengele, Mark M Somoza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matej SackInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. matej.sack@univie.ac.at.
Kathrin HölzInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. kathrin.hoelz@univie.ac.at.
Ann-Katrin HolikDepartment of Nutritional and Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. ann-katrin.holik@univie.ac.at.
Nicole KretschyInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. nicole.kretschy@univie.ac.at.
Veronika SomozaDepartment of Nutritional and Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. veronika.somoza@univie.ac.at.
Klaus-Peter StengeleRoche Diagnostics, Penzberg, Germany. klaus-peter.stengele@roche.com.
Mark M SomozaInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. mark.somoza@univie.ac.at.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 23797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA microarrays are a core element of modern genomics research and medical diagnostics, allowing the simple and simultaneous determination of the relative abundances of hundreds of thousands to millions of genomic DNA or RNA sequences in a sample. Photolithographic in situ synthesis, using light projection from a digitally-controlled array of micromirrors, has been successful at both commercial and laboratory scales. The advantages of this synthesis method are its ability to reliably produce high-quality custom microarrays with a very high spatial density of DNA features using a compact device with few moving parts. The phosphoramidite chemistry used in photolithographic synthesis is similar to that used in conventional solid-phase synthesis of oligonucleotides, but some unique differences require an independent optimization of the synthesis chemistry to achieve fast and low-cost synthesis without compromising microarray quality.

resultsHigh microarray quality could be maintained while reducing coupling time to a few seconds using DCI activator. Five coupling activators were compared, which resulted in microarray hybridization signals following the order ETT > Activator 42 > DCI ≫ BTT ≫ pyridinium chloride, but only the use of DCI led to both high signal and highly uniform feature intensities. The photodeprotection time was also reduced to a few seconds by replacing the NPPOC photolabile group with the new thiophenyl-NPPOC group. Other chemical parameters, such as oxidation and washing steps were also optimized.

conclusionsHighly optimized and microarray-specific phosphoramidite chemistry, along with the use of the very photosensitive thiophenyl-NPPOC protecting group allow for the synthesis of high-complexity DNA arrays using coupling times of 15 s and deprotection times of 9 s. The resulting overall cycle time (coupling to coupling) of about 50 s, results in a three-fold reduction in synthesis time.

Indexed as

Caco-2 CellsCell Line, TumorDNAHumansLightNucleic Acid HybridizationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOligonucleotidesOrganophosphorus CompoundsPhotochemistrySolid-Phase Synthesis TechniquesDNAOligonucleotidesOrganophosphorus Compoundsphosphoramidite

Identifiers

PMID26936369
PMCPMC4776362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.