Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26935960›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2016

Correlates of women's intentions to be screened for human papillomavirus for cervical cancer screening with an extended interval.

Gina S Ogilvie, Laurie W Smith, Dirk van Niekerk, Fareeza Khurshed, Heather N Pedersen, Darlene Taylor, Katharine Thomson, Sandra B Greene, Suzanne M Babich, Eduardo L Franco and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Patients' Attitude toward Less Frequent Surveillance of Low-Risk Pancreatic Cysts: A Multicenter European Cohort Study.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025
    Observational
  5. Exploring the role of the oncology nurse in cervical cancer screening programs during times of transition.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Acceptability and potential impact on uptake of using different risk stratification approaches to determine eligibility for screening: A population-based survey.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gina S OgilvieUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. gina.ogilvie@cw.bc.ca.
Laurie W SmithBritish Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada. laurie.smith@bccancer.bc.ca.
Dirk van NiekerkBritish Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada. dvanniek@bccancer.bc.ca.
Fareeza KhurshedBritish Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada. fkhurshed@gmail.com.
Heather N PedersenUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. heather.pedersen@cw.bc.ca.
Darlene TaylorBritish Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada. darlene.taylor@cw.bc.ca.
Katharine ThomsonUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. katharine.thomson@bccancer.bc.ca.
Sandra B GreeneGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. sbgreene@email.unc.edu.
Suzanne M BabichRichard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA. smbabich@iu.edu.
Eduardo L FrancoMcGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. eduardo.franco@mcgill.ca.
Andrew J ColdmanUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. acoldman@bccrc.ca.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-risk HPV DNA testing has been proposed as a primary tool for cervical cancer screening (HPV-CCS) as an alternative to the Papanicolaou cytology- method. This study describes factors associated with women's intentions to attend cervical cancer screening if high-risk HPV DNA testing (HPV-CCS) was implemented as a primary screening tool, and if screening were conducted every 4 years starting after age 25.

methodsThis online survey was designed using the Theory of Planned Behaviour to assess factors that impact women's intentions to attend HPV-CCS among women aged 25-69 upon exit of the HPV FOCAL trial. Univariate and regression analyses were performed to compare the demographic, sexual history, and smoking characteristics between women willing and unwilling to screen, and scales for intention to attend HPV-CCS. A qualitative analysis was performed by compiling and coding the comments section of the survey.

resultsOf the 981 women who completed the survey in full, only 51.4 % responded that they intended to attend HPV-CCS with a delayed start age and extended screening interval. Women who intended to screen were more likely to have higher education (AOR 0.59, 95 % CI [0.37, 0.93]), while both positive attitudes (AOR 1.26, 95 % CI [1.23, 1.30]) and perceived behavior control (AOR 1.06, 95 % CI [1.02, 1.10]) were significant predictors of intention to screen. Among women who provided comments in the survey, a large number of women expressed fears about not being checked more than every 4 years, but 12 % stated that these fears may be alleviated by having more information.

conclusionsAcceptability of increased screening intervals and starting age could be improved through enhanced education of benefits. Program planners should consider measures to assess and improve women's knowledge, attitudes and beliefs prior to the implementation of new screening programs to avoid unintended consequences.

Indexed as

IntentionAdultAgedFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsPsychological TheoryQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID26935960
PMCPMC4776398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.