Observational studyInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2016
Evaluating antidepressant treatment prior to adding second-line therapies among patients with treatment-resistant depression.
Observational study in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- What is the impact of antidepressant side effects on medication adherence among adult patients diagnosed with depressive disorder: A systematic review.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical Guidelines of the Egyptian Psychiatric Association for the Management of Treatment-Resistant Unipolar Depression in Egypt.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Use of Guideline-Recommended Treatments for PTSD Among Community-Based Providers in Texas and Vermont: Implications for the Veterans Choice Program.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2019Article
- The impact of depression medications on oral antidiabetic drug adherence in patients with diabetes and depression.Journal of diabetes and its complications · 2018Article
- Investigational drugs in recent clinical trials for treatment-resistant depression.Expert review of neurotherapeutics · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with depression can be mistakenly labeled as treatment-resistant if they fail to receive an adequate first-line antidepressant trial. Adding second-line agents to the treatment regimens can create an additional burden on both the patients and the healthcare system.
objectivesTo determine if depressed patients receive an adequate antidepressant trial prior to starting second-line therapy and to investigate the association between the type of second-line treatment and severity of illness or depression among unipolar versus bipolar patients.
settingOklahoma Medicaid claims data between 2006 and 2011.
methodsSubjects were depression-diagnosed adult patients with at least two prescriptions of antidepressants followed by a second-line agent. Patients were categorized into one of three groups: an atypical antipsychotic, other augmentation agents (lithium, buspirone, and triiodothyronine), or adding antidepressants, based on the type of second-line therapy. An adequate trial was defined per the American Psychiatric Association guidelines. Factors associated with the type of treatment were tested using multinomial logistic regression models stratified by type of depression (unipolar vs. bipolar patients).
main outcome measureVariables used to measure receiving an adequate antidepressant trial included: trial duration, adherence, dose adequacy, and number of distinct antidepressant trials.
resultsA total of 3910 patients were included in the analysis. Most subjects reached the recommended antidepressant dose. However, 28 % of patients had an antidepressant trial duration <4 weeks and only 60 % tried at least two antidepressant regimens prior to adding second-line therapy. Approximately 50 % of the subjects were non-adherent across all groups. Severity of illness and receipt of an adequate antidepressant trial were not predictors of the type of second-line treatment.
conclusionMany patients do not receive an adequate antidepressant trial before starting a second-line agent. The type of second-line treatment was independent of severity of depression. These findings support policies that require reviewing the recommended dose and duration of the first-line antidepressant before adding second-line agents. Healthcare providers need to review the patient's history and reconsider the evidence for prescribing second-line agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26935957What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.