Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26935955›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2016

Re-imagining adherence to treatment from the "other side": local interpretations of adverse anti-malarial drug reactions in the Peruvian Amazon.

Joan Muela Ribera, Susanna Hausmann-Muela, Charlotte Gryseels, Koen Peeters Grietens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Joan Muela RiberaDepartament d'Antropologia, Filosofia i Treball Social Medical Anthropology Research Centre (MARC), Rovira i Virgili University, Avinguda de Catalunya 85, 43002, Tarragona, Spain. joan.muela@yahoo.es.
Susanna Hausmann-MuelaPartners for Applied Social Sciences (PASS) International, Tessenderlo, Belgium. susanna.hausmann_muela@yahoo.es.
Charlotte GryseelsMedical Anthropology Unit, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000, Antwerp, Belgium. cgryseels@itg.be.
Koen Peeters GrietensPartners for Applied Social Sciences (PASS) International, Tessenderlo, Belgium. kpeeters@itg.be.
Carolus Magnus University · BEInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEJanssen (Belgium) · BERSscan International (Belgium) · BE

Funding

Human Reservoirs of Plasmodium vivax Transmission in the Peruvian AmazonR01AI067727 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI VINETZ, JOSEPH M. · 2006 to 2010
$3.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI067727NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI067727-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients' adherence to malaria treatment is a key issue in malaria control and elimination efforts. Previous studies have reported on problems with adherence to anti-malarials, which in part can be related to adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of anti-malarials. However, there has been a relative inattention to the cultural and social aspects of these anti-malarial side-effects and, more broadly, to how cultural representations of body functions may affect people's behaviour. In this article, an in-depth analysis is presented of the cultural logics underlying local interpretations of adverse drug reactions to anti-malarials in the Peruvian Amazon.

methodsEthnographic fieldwork was carried out during two periods of 3 months in 2007 and 2008. Fieldwork was carried out in 10 communities in the department of Loreto, the administrative area corresponding to the Peruvian Amazon. Thirty in-depth interviews of key and general informants, focusing on perceived adverse anti-malarial drug reactions, were carried out in Spanish, recorded, transcribed and analysed.

resultsInformants reported surprisingly elevated problems of adverse drug reactions. Frequent statements about medication that "shocked", "cut the blood" or provoked "allergic reactions" are difficult to interpret from a biomedical perspective, and only make when considering the underlying cultural logics. The logic of maintaining a 'temperate' physical and moral balance by avoiding excesses of 'hot' or 'cold' or sudden changes of 'body heat' can explain the locally constructed adverse drug reactions to anti-malarials. DISCUSSION: Adherence is a continuous process during which the patient evaluates and re-evaluates the course of his illness and the perceived benefits and risks of the treatment. What counts are the processes, the interpretations and the logics which underlie the decisions to adhere to or to abandon treatment. Adherence can only be adequately addressed if such interpretations are understood and taken into account.

Indexed as

AdultAntimalarialsFemaleHumansMalariaMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedPeruAntimalarials

Identifiers

PMID26935955
PMCPMC4774029
OpenAlexW2288270844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.