Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26935732›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2016

Evaluation of Fluorescent Capillary Electrophoresis for Rapid Identification of Candida Fungal Infections.

Hana Obručová, Radka Tihelková, Iva Kotásková, Filip Růžička, Veronika Holá, Eva Němcová, Tomáš Freiberger

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests forPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hana ObručováCentre for Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation Brno, Genetics Laboratory, Brno, Czech Republic Molecular Immunology and Microbiology, Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Radka TihelkováCentre for Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation Brno, Genetics Laboratory, Brno, Czech Republic.
Iva KotáskováCentre for Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation Brno, Genetics Laboratory, Brno, Czech Republic Molecular Immunology and Microbiology, Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Filip RůžičkaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Veronika HoláDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Eva NěmcováCentre for Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation Brno, Genetics Laboratory, Brno, Czech Republic International Clinical Research Centre, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Tomáš FreibergerCentre for Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation Brno, Genetics Laboratory, Brno, Czech Republic Molecular Immunology and Microbiology, Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University Brno, Brno, Czech Republic tomas.freiberger@cktch.cz.
Centrum kardiovaskulární a transplantační chirurgie · CZCentral European Institute of Technology · CZSt. Anne's University Hospital Brno · CZUniversity Hospital Brno · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early diagnosis of fungal infection is critical for initiating antifungal therapy and reducing the high mortality rate in immunocompromised patients. In this study, we focused on rapid and sensitive identification of clinically important Candida species, utilizing the variability in the length of the ITS2 rRNA gene and fluorescent capillary electrophoresis (f-ITS2-PCR-CE). The method was developed and optimized on 29 various Candida reference strains from which 26 Candida species were clearly identified, while Candida guilliermondii, C. fermentati, and C. carpophila, which are closely related, could not be distinguished. The method was subsequently validated on 143 blinded monofungal clinical isolates (comprising 26 species) and was able to identify 88% of species unambiguously. This indicated a higher resolution power than the classical phenotypic approach which correctly identified 73%. Finally, the culture-independent potential of this technique was addressed by the analysis of 55 retrospective DNA samples extracted directly from clinical material. The method showed 100% sensitivity and specificity compared to those of the combined results of cultivation and panfungal PCR followed by sequencing used as a gold standard. In conclusion, this newly developed f-ITS2-PCR-CE analytical approach was shown to be a fast, sensitive, and highly reproducible tool for both culture-dependent and culture-independent identification of clinically important Candida strains, including species of the "psilosis" complex.

Indexed as

CandidaCandidiasisDNA, FungalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerElectrophoresis, CapillaryHumansMicrobiological TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityTime FactorsDNA, FungalDNA, Ribosomal Spacer

Identifiers

PMID26935732
PMCPMC4844707
OpenAlexW2328452101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.