Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26935437›Full record

ArticleTheoretical medicine and bioethics2016

On the fragility of medical virtue in a neoliberal context: the case of commercial conflicts of interest in reproductive medicine.

Christopher Mayes, Brette Blakely, Ian Kerridge, Paul Komesaroff, Ian Olver, Wendy Lipworth

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Theoretical medicine and bioethics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Human vulnerability in medical contexts.Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christopher MayesCentre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Level 1, Medical Foundation Building, K25, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. christopher.mayes@sydney.edu.au.
Brette BlakelyCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science (CHRIS), Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talevera Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Ian KerridgeCentre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Level 1, Medical Foundation Building, K25, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Paul KomesaroffCentre for Ethics in Medicine and Society, The Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Commercial Road, Prahran, VIC, 3181, Australia.
Ian OlverDivision of Health Sciences, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, P5-06e Playford Building I City East Campus I, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Wendy LipworthCentre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Level 1, Medical Foundation Building, K25, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social, political, and economic environments play an active role in nurturing professional virtue. Yet, these environments can also lead to the erosion of virtue. As such, professional virtue is fragile and vulnerable to environmental shifts. While physicians are often considered to be among the most virtuous of professional groups, concern has also always existed about the impact of commercial arrangements on physicians' willingness and capacity to enact their professional virtues. This article examines the ways in which commercial arrangements have been negotiated to secure medical virtue from real or perceived threats of erosion. In particular, we focus on the concern surrounding conflicts of interest arising from commercial arrangements that have developed as a result of neoliberal economic and social policies. The deregulation of medical markets and privatization of services have produced new commercial relationships that are often misunderstood by patients, publics, and physicians themselves. 'Conflicts of interest' policies have been introduced in an attempt to safeguard ethical conduct and medical practice. However, a number of virtue ethicists have critiqued these policies as inadequate for securing virtue. We examine the ways in which commercial arrangements have been seen to impact upon medical virtue, both historically and in the context of modern medicine (using the example of fertility services in Australia). We then describe and critique current efforts to restore clinical virtue through both conflict of interest policies and through virtue ethics. Finally, we suggest some possible ways of addressing the corrosive effects of neoliberalism on medical virtue.

Indexed as

Conflict of InterestPoliticsVirtuesAustraliaCommerceEthics, MedicalHumansPhysiciansPublic PolicyReproductive MedicineCommericalisationConflicts of interestFertility servicesIVFProfessional ethicsVirtue ethics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.