ArticleMolecular medicine reports2016
[Corrigendum] Knockdown of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E suppresses cell growth and invasion, and induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in a human lung adenocarcinoma cell line.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Upregulation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E associates with a poor prognosis in gallbladder cancer and promotes cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo.International journal of molecular medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mol Med Rep 12:[Related article:] 7971–7978, 2015; DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2015.4468 Following the publication of this article, an interested reader drew to our attention an anomaly associated with the presentation of Fig. 3A. The images selected for the '72 h Blank' and the '72 h Mock' panels were inadvertently selected from the same original photograph. This error arose during the editing process of our paper with a professional English Editing Service, and our failure to notice the mismatching of the images during the final proofreading of the manuscript prior to submission. A corrected version of Fig. 3 is presented here (right), which includes the corrected images for the 72 h Blank' and the '72 h Mock' panels. This error did not affect the overall conclusions reported in the present study. We sincerely apologize for this mistake, and thank the reader of our article who drew this matter to our attention. Furthermore, we regret any inconvenience this mistake has caused.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.