Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26935205›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2016

Factors associated with tick bites and pathogen prevalence in ticks parasitizing humans in Georgia, USA.

Elizabeth R Gleim, Laurel E Garrison, Marianne S Vello, Mason Y Savage, Gaylord Lopez, Roy D Berghaus, Michael J Yabsley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Microorganisms · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Tick species infesting humans in the United States.Ticks and tick-borne diseases · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Presence ofVeterinary sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. TheFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  14. New Jersey-Wide Survey of Spotted Fever GroupThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Multistate Survey of American Dog Ticks (Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth R GleimSoutheastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study, College of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Georgia, 589 D.W. Brooks Dr., Wildlife Health Bldg, Athens, GA, 30602, USA. egleim@gmail.com.
Laurel E GarrisonGeorgia Department of Human Resources, Division of Public Health, 2 Peachtree St. NW, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA. laurelegarrison@gmail.com.
Marianne S VelloGeorgia Department of Human Resources, Division of Public Health, 2 Peachtree St. NW, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA. marianne.vello@gmail.com.
Mason Y SavageSoutheastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study, College of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Georgia, 589 D.W. Brooks Dr., Wildlife Health Bldg, Athens, GA, 30602, USA. mysavage@gmail.com.
Gaylord LopezGeorgia Poison Center, 80 Jesse Hill Junior Dr. SE, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA. glopez@georgiapoisoncenter.org.
Roy D BerghausDepartment of Population Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Georgia, 501 D.W. Brooks Dr, Atlanta, GA, 30602, USA. berghaus@uga.edu.
Michael J YabsleySoutheastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study, College of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Georgia, 589 D.W. Brooks Dr., Wildlife Health Bldg, Athens, GA, 30602, USA. myabsley@uga.edu.
University of Georgia · USGeorgia Department of Public Health · USWashington Poison Center · US

Funding

Georgia Veterinary Scholars Summer Research ProgramT35OD010433 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI SUSAN SANCHEZ · 2012 to 2026
$846k
Georgia Veterinary Scholars Summer Research ProgramT35RR022685 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI SANCHEZ, SUSAN · 2006 to 2010
$201k
NCRR NIH HHS T35 RR022685NIH HHS T35 OD010433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence and emergence of tick-borne diseases has increased dramatically in the United States during the past 30 years, yet few large-scale epidemiological studies have been performed on individuals bitten by ticks. Epidemiological information, including disease development, may provide valuable information regarding effectiveness of tick bite prevention education, pathogen transmission, human-disease dynamics, and potential implications for under reporting of tick-borne diseases.

methodsTicks found attached to Georgia residents were submitted for identification and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for Francisella tularensis, Ehrlichia, Anaplasma, Borrelia, and Rickettsia spp. Tick bite victims were interviewed three weeks after the tick bite to identify various epidemiologic factors associated with infestation and if signs suggestive of a tick-borne disease had developed. Fisher's exact test of independence was used to evaluate associations between various factors evaluated in the study. A multivariable logistic regression model was used for the prediction of non-specific illness post-tick bite.

resultsFrom April 2005-December 2006, 444 participants submitted 597 ticks (426 Amblyomma americanum, 142 Dermacentor variabilis, 19 A. maculatum, 7 Ixodes scapularis, 3 Amblyomma sp.) which originated from 95 counties. Only 25 (34 %) of 74 interviewed individuals purposely took tick bite prevention measures. Ticks that were PCR positive for bacterial organisms were attached to 136 participants. Of the 77 participants who developed non-specific illness, 50 did not have PCR positive ticks, whereas 27 did have PCR positive tick (s). Of those 27 individuals, 12 fit the criteria for a possible tick-borne illness (i.e., tick attached >6 h [if known], ≥4 day incubation period, and the individual exhibited clinical symptoms typical of a tick-borne illness without exhibiting cough, sore throat, or sinus congestion). Ticks from these individuals were positive for R. amblyommii (n = 8), E. ewingii (n = 1), R. montana (n = 1), R. rhiphicephali (n = 1), and Rickettsia sp. TR-39 (n = 1).

conclusionsAlthough illnesses reported in this study cannot definitively be connected with tick bites, it does provide insight into development, diagnosis, and treatment of possible tick-borne diseases post-tick bite. The study also provided data on pathogen prevalence, and epidemiologic factors associated with tick bites, as well as tick presence by county in Georgia.

Indexed as

Tick BitesAnimalsBacteriaEctoparasitic InfestationsGeorgiaHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionPrevalenceTick-Borne DiseasesTicks

Identifiers

PMID26935205
PMCPMC4776404
OpenAlexW2290773091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.