ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2016
Predictive Accuracy of Chest Radiographs in Diagnosing Tachypneic Children.
Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of physician lung ultrasound versus chest radiography for pneumonia diagnosis in a peri-urban South African cohort.Pediatric radiology · 2024Review
- The utility of chest x-ray and lung ultrasound in the management of infants and children presenting with severe pneumonia in low-and middle-income countries: A pragmatic scoping review.Journal of global health · 2022Article
- Chest radiography in children aged 2-59 months enrolled in the Innovative Treatments in Pneumonia (ITIP) project in Lilongwe Malawi: a secondary analysis.BMC pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo test the predictive accuracy and reporting reproducibility of digital chest radiographs under low-resource conditions.
methodsOne hundred thirty four tachypneic children who presented to two Indian hospitals were enrolled. Based on review of 16 variables recorded in the Emergency Room (ER) by a senior pediatrician, children were given one of the four clinical diagnoses: pneumonia, wheezy disease, mixed and non-respiratory. Every child also had a digital CXR. It was interpreted by ER physician, pediatrician and two independent radiologists. All used the same standardized interpretation system (one or more of: normal, minor patches, major patches, hyperinflation, lobar change, pleural effusion).
resultsThe 10 % of CXRs showing pleural effusions reliably predicted pneumonia and disease severity. For all other CXR findings, the correlation between CXR interpretation and clinical diagnosis was moderate to poor. Apart from pleural effusions, inter-observer agreements between interpretations made by ER physician, pediatrician and radiologist were also poor (kappa <0.4).
conclusionsWith the exception of pleural effusions, CXR findings, interpreted by a radiologist, had moderate to poor power to predict respiratory diagnosis or disease severity defined by a pediatrician. Value of CXRs was further reduced by poor inter-observer agreement. When investigating tachypneic children under low-resource conditions, CXRs should be used with a clear understanding of their limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.