Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26935103›Full record

ReviewDisease models & mechanisms2016

FlyBase portals to human disease research using Drosophila models.

Gillian H Millburn, Madeline A Crosby, L Sian Gramates, Susan Tweedie, FlyBase Consortium

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Disease models & mechanisms, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Modeling neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental disorders in theLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. An efficient injection protocol forBiology methods & protocols · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Ackee (Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022
    Article
  14. Using FlyBase: A Database of Drosophila Genes and Genetics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  15. Cells · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Aspirin as a Potential Geroprotector: Experimental Data and Clinical Evidence.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Micro-computed tomography as a platform for exploringDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2019
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gillian H MillburnDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK gm119@cam.ac.uk.
Madeline A CrosbyThe Biological Laboratories, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
L Sian GramatesThe Biological Laboratories, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Susan TweedieDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK.
FlyBase Consortium

Funding

Resource Project CoreU41HG000739 · NHGRI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI PERRIMON, NORBERT · 2014 to 2022
$32.3M
Medical Research Council G1000968NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG000739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of Drosophila melanogaster as a model for studying human disease is well established, reflected by the steady increase in both the number and proportion of fly papers describing human disease models in recent years. In this article, we highlight recent efforts to improve the availability and accessibility of the disease model information in FlyBase (http://flybase.org), the model organism database for Drosophila. FlyBase has recently introduced Human Disease Model Reports, each of which presents background information on a specific disease, a tabulation of related disease subtypes, and summaries of experimental data and results using fruit flies. Integrated presentations of relevant data and reagents described in other sections of FlyBase are incorporated into these reports, which are specifically designed to be accessible to non-fly researchers in order to promote collaboration across model organism communities working in translational science. Another key component of disease model information in FlyBase is that data are collected in a consistent format --- using the evolving Disease Ontology (an open-source standardized ontology for human-disease-associated biomedical data) - to allow robust and intuitive searches. To facilitate this, FlyBase has developed a dedicated tool for querying and navigating relevant data, which include mutations that model a disease and any associated interacting modifiers. In this article, we describe how data related to fly models of human disease are presented in individual Gene Reports and in the Human Disease Model Reports. Finally, we discuss search strategies and new query tools that are available to access the disease model data in FlyBase.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchDatabases, GeneticDiseaseDisease Models, AnimalAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterHumansDisease modelDrosophilaFlyBaseOnline resource

Identifiers

PMID26935103
PMCPMC4826978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.