Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26935102›Full record

ReviewDisease models & mechanisms2016

Drosophila tools and assays for the study of human diseases.

Berrak Ugur, Kuchuan Chen, Hugo J Bellen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Disease models & mechanisms, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 299 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
299citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

299 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. A Landscape ofBiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Special Issue "International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Molecular biology of the cell · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

239 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Berrak UgurProgram in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Kuchuan ChenProgram in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Hugo J BellenProgram in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA hbellen@bcm.edu.

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many of the internal organ systems of Drosophila melanogaster are functionally analogous to those in vertebrates, including humans. Although humans and flies differ greatly in terms of their gross morphological and cellular features, many of the molecular mechanisms that govern development and drive cellular and physiological processes are conserved between both organisms. The morphological differences are deceiving and have led researchers to undervalue the study of invertebrate organs in unraveling pathogenic mechanisms of diseases. In this review and accompanying poster, we highlight the physiological and molecular parallels between fly and human organs that validate the use of Drosophila to study the molecular pathogenesis underlying human diseases. We discuss assays that have been developed in flies to study the function of specific genes in the central nervous system, heart, liver and kidney, and provide examples of the use of these assays to address questions related to human diseases. These assays provide us with simple yet powerful tools to study the pathogenic mechanisms associated with human disease-causing genes.

Indexed as

DiseaseAnimalsBiological AssayDrosophila melanogasterHumansOrgan SpecificityDrosophilaFat bodyHeartHuman disease modelsKidneyLiverMalpighian tubulesNephrocytesNervous systemNeurodegenerationOenocyteRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID26935102
PMCPMC4833332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.