ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2016
Laparoscopic rectal cancer resection: inferior to open or not?
Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Guidance on the Surgical Management of Rectal Cancer: An Umbrella Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Does the visceral fat area impact the histopathology specimen metrics after total mesorectal excision for distal rectal cancer?Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- Does the mesorectal fat area impact the histopathology metrics of the specimen in males undergoing TME for distal rectal cancer?Updates in surgery · 2023Article
- Is taTME delivering?Updates in surgery · 2019Article
- Conventional and/or laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: what is the current evidence?Innovative surgical sciences · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Erratum issuedCorrigendum.2016
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26934849What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.