Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26934644›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2016

Combining optogenetic stimulation and fMRI to validate a multivariate dynamical systems model for estimating causal brain interactions.

Srikanth Ryali, Yen-Yu Ian Shih, Tianwen Chen, John Kochalka, Daniel Albaugh, Zhongnan Fang, Kaustubh Supekar, Jin Hyung Lee, Vinod Menon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Optogenetic fMRI for Brain-Wide Circuit Analysis of Sensory Processing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Charting the path in rodent functional neuroimaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Putative neurochemical and cell type contributions to hemodynamic activity in the rodent caudate putamen.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The role of PFC networks in cognitive control and executive function.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Srikanth RyaliStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA. Electronic address: sryali@stanford.edu.
Yen-Yu Ian ShihUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Tianwen ChenStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
John KochalkaStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Daniel AlbaughUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Zhongnan FangStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Kaustubh SupekarStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Jin Hyung LeeStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Vinod MenonStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA. Electronic address: menon@stanford.edu.

Funding

Functional dissection of therapeutic deep brain stimulation circuitryR01NS091236 · NINDS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SHIH, YEN-YU IAN · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
Methods for Dynamic Causal Interactions in the Developing Human BrainK25HD074652 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RYALI, SRIKANTH · 2013 to 2019
$663k
Multivariate Dynamical Systems Methods for Identifying Causal Interactions in fMRR21NS071221 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MENON, VINOD · 2011 to 2012
$435k
NICHD NIH HHS K25 HD074652NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS091236NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS071221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

State-space multivariate dynamical systems (MDS) (Ryali et al. 2011) and other causal estimation models are being increasingly used to identify directed functional interactions between brain regions. However, the validity and accuracy of such methods are poorly understood. Performance evaluation based on computer simulations of small artificial causal networks can address this problem to some extent, but they often involve simplifying assumptions that reduce biological validity of the resulting data. Here, we use a novel approach taking advantage of recently developed optogenetic fMRI (ofMRI) techniques to selectively stimulate brain regions while simultaneously recording high-resolution whole-brain fMRI data. ofMRI allows for a more direct investigation of causal influences from the stimulated site to brain regions activated downstream and is therefore ideal for evaluating causal estimation methods in vivo. We used ofMRI to investigate whether MDS models for fMRI can accurately estimate causal functional interactions between brain regions. Two cohorts of ofMRI data were acquired, one at Stanford University and the University of California Los Angeles (Cohort 1) and the other at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill (Cohort 2). In each cohort, optical stimulation was delivered to the right primary motor cortex (M1). General linear model analysis revealed prominent downstream thalamic activation in Cohort 1, and caudate-putamen (CPu) activation in Cohort 2. MDS accurately estimated causal interactions from M1 to thalamus and from M1 to CPu in Cohort 1 and Cohort 2, respectively. As predicted, no causal influences were found in the reverse direction. Additional control analyses demonstrated the specificity of causal interactions between stimulated and target sites. Our findings suggest that MDS state-space models can accurately and reliably estimate causal interactions in ofMRI data and further validate their use for estimating causal interactions in fMRI. More generally, our study demonstrates that the combined use of optogenetics and fMRI provides a powerful new tool for evaluating computational methods designed to estimate causal interactions between distributed brain regions.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsBrainBrain MappingCaudate NucleusFemaleMagnetic Resonance ImagingMotor CortexMultivariate AnalysisNeural PathwaysOptogeneticsPutamenRats, Sprague-DawleyThalamusCausalityChannelrhodopsinDynamical systemsOptogenetic fMRI

Identifiers

PMID26934644
PMCPMC4851892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.