Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26934553›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Prostate stromal cell proteomics analysis discriminates normal from tumour reactive stromal phenotypes.

Jason P Webber, Lisa K Spary, Malcolm D Mason, Zsuzsanna Tabi, Ian A Brewis, Aled Clayton

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Ion Channel Profiling in Prostate Cancer: Toward Cell Population-Specific Screening.Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jason P WebberDivision of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
Lisa K SparyDivision of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
Malcolm D MasonDivision of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
Zsuzsanna TabiDivision of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
Ian A BrewisInstitute of Translation, Innovation, Methodology and Engagement (TIME), Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
Aled ClaytonDivision of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
Cardiff University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes within interstitial stromal compartments often accompany carcinogenesis, and this is true of prostate cancer. Typically, the tissue becomes populated by myofibroblasts that can promote progression. Not all myofibroblasts exhibit the same negative influence, however, and identifying the aggressive form of myofibroblast may provide useful information at diagnosis. A means of molecularly defining such myofibroblasts is unknown. We compared protein profiles of normal and diseased stroma isolated from prostate cancer patients to identify discriminating hallmarks of disease-associated stroma. We included the stimulation of normal stromal cells with known myofibroblast inducers namely soluble TGFβ and exosome-associated-TGFβ and compared the function and protein profiles arising. In all 6-patients examined, diseased stroma exhibited a pro-angiogenic influence on endothelial cells, generating large multicellular vessel-like structures. Identical structures were apparent following stimulation of normal stroma with exosomes (5/6 patients), but TGFβ-stimulation generated a non-angiogenic stroma. Proteomics highlighted disease-related cytoskeleton alterations such as elevated Transgelin (TAGLN). Many of these were also changed following TGFβ or exosome stimulation and did not well discriminate the nature of the stimulus. Soluble TGFβ, however triggered differential expression of proteins related to mitochondrial function including voltage dependent ion channels VDAC1 and 2, and this was not found in the other stromal types studied. Surprisingly, Aldehyde Dehydrogenase (ALDH1A1), a stem-cell associated protein was detected in normal stromal cells and found to decrease in disease. In summary, we have discovered a set of proteins that contribute to defining disease-associated myofibroblasts, and emphasise the similarity between exosome-generated myofibroblasts and those naturally arising in situ.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedExosomesHumansMaleMyofibroblastsPhenotypeProstateProstatic NeoplasmsProteomeProteomicsStromal CellsTransforming Growth Factor betaBiomarkers, TumorProteomeTransforming Growth Factor betaangiogenesiscancer associated fibroblastsexosomesprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID26934553
PMCPMC4991442
OpenAlexW2324670396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.