Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26934421›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2016

Parents' and providers' attitudes toward school-located provision and school-entry requirements for HPV vaccines.

Jessica Vercruysse, Nagasudha L Chigurupati, Leslie Fung, Gauri Apte, Natalie Pierre-Joseph, Rebecca B Perkins

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica Vercruyssea Boston University School of Medicine , Boston , MA , USA.
Nagasudha L Chigurupatia Boston University School of Medicine , Boston , MA , USA.
Leslie Fungb Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Services, Boston University , Boston , MA , USA.
Gauri Aptea Boston University School of Medicine , Boston , MA , USA.
Natalie Pierre-Josepha Boston University School of Medicine , Boston , MA , USA.
Rebecca B Perkinsa Boston University School of Medicine , Boston , MA , USA.
Boston University · US

Funding

Clarifying the effects of race and socioeconomic status on disparities in HPV vacU01IP000636 · IP · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI JOSEPH, NATALIE, PERKINS, REBECCA BERNSTEIN · 2012 to 2012
$300k
NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP000636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine parents' and providers' attitudes toward school-located provision and school-entry requirements for HPV vaccination.

methodsParents/guardians of 11-17 y old girls and pediatric healthcare providers at one inner-city public clinic and three private practices completed semi-structured interviews in 2012-2013. Participants were asked open-ended questions regarding their attitudes toward school-located provision and school-entry requirements for HPV vaccination. Parents' answers were analyzed with relationship to whether their daughters had not initiated, initiated but not completed, or completed the HPV vaccine series. Qualitative analysis was used to identify themes related to shared views.

results129 parents/guardians and 34 providers participated. 61% of parents supported providing HPV vaccinations in schools, citing reasons of convenience, improved access, and positive peer pressure. Those who opposed school-located provision raised concerns related to privacy and the capacity of school nurses to manage vaccine-related reactions. Parents whose daughters had not completed the series were more likely to intend to vaccinate their daughters in schools (70%) and support requirements (64%) than parents who had not initiated vaccination (42% would vaccinate at school, 46% support requirements) or completed the series (42% would vaccinate at school, 32% support requirements; p < 0 .05 for all comparisons). 81% of providers supported offering vaccination in schools, wanting to take advantage of the captive audience, improve vaccine completion rates, and decrease the administrative burden on medical office staff, but were concerned about adequate information transfer between schools and medical offices. Only 32% of providers supported school-entry requirements, largely because they felt that a requirement might provoke a public backlash that could further hinder vaccination efforts.

conclusionsSchool-located provision of HPV vaccination was widely accepted by healthcare providers and parents whose children have not completed the series, indicating that this venue might be a valuable addition to improve completion rates. Support for school-entry requirements was limited among both parents and healthcare providers.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedChildFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesParentsSchool Health ServicesSchoolsPapillomavirus VaccinesHPV vaccinationparents attitudesprovider attitudesschool-entry vaccine requirementsschool located immunizationsvaccine mandates

Identifiers

PMID26934421
PMCPMC4964627
OpenAlexW2333487976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.