Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26934366›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2016

Placing memories in context: Hippocampal representations promote retrieval of appropriate memories.

David A Bulkin, L Matthew Law, David M Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Locus Coeruleus Phasic, But Not Tonic, Activation Initiates Global Remapping in a Familiar Environment.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Inhibitory engrams in perception and memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David A BulkinDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
L Matthew LawBarrow Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona.
David M SmithDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

Funding

Hippocampus, Retrosplenial Cortex and Contextual Learning and MemoryR01MH083809 · NIMH · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, DAVID M., WARDEN, MELISSA RHOADS · 2010 to 2022
$3.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Returning to a familiar context triggers retrieval of relevant memories, making memories from other contexts less likely to intrude and cause interference. We investigated the physiology that underlies the use of context to prevent interference by recording hippocampal neurons while rats learned two conflicting sets of discrimination problems, either in the same context or in two distinct contexts. Rats that learned the conflicting problem sets in the same context maintained similar neural representations, and performed poorly because conflicting memories interfered with new learning. In contrast, rats that learned in different contexts formed distinct ensemble representations and performed significantly better. We also measured trial-to-trial variation in representations and found that hippocampal activity was directly linked with performance: on trials where an old representation was active, rats were far more likely to make errors. These results show that the formation of distinct hippocampal representations is critical for contextually appropriate memory retrieval. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsConflict, PsychologicalDiscrimination, PsychologicalHippocampusLearningMaleMemoryNeuronsNeuropsychological TestsOlfactory PerceptionProblem SolvingRats, Long-EvansSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSpace Perceptioncontextinterferencememory

Identifiers

PMID26934366
PMCPMC4912442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.