Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26933943›Full record

ArticleSocial work in health care2016

Understanding motivations to participate in an observational research study: Why do patients enroll?

Michael C Soule, Eleanor E Beale, Laura Suarez, Scott R Beach, Carol A Mastromauro, Christopher M Celano, Shannon V Moore, Jeff C Huffman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social work in health care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patient and Caregiver Experiences of Participating in Parkinson's Disease Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Elevated AD biomarkers do not explain cognitive performance in a community-recruited clinical trial cohort.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. "I'm tired of seeing my friends die": Barriers and facilitators to participating in clinical trials among rural people who use drugs in the United States.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael C Soulea Department of Psychiatry , Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston , Massachusetts , USA.
Eleanor E Bealea Department of Psychiatry , Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston , Massachusetts , USA.
Laura Suareza Department of Psychiatry , Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston , Massachusetts , USA.
Scott R Beacha Department of Psychiatry , Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston , Massachusetts , USA.
Carol A Mastromauroa Department of Psychiatry , Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston , Massachusetts , USA.
Christopher M Celanoa Department of Psychiatry , Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston , Massachusetts , USA.
Shannon V Moorea Department of Psychiatry , Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston , Massachusetts , USA.
Jeff C Huffmana Department of Psychiatry , Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston , Massachusetts , USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Developing a positive psychology intervention to improve cardiac health behaviorsR01HL113272 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HUFFMAN, JEFF C · 2013 to 2017
$2.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL113272NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL113272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By understanding common motivations for participating in observational research studies, clinicians may better understand the perceived benefits of research participation from their clients' perspective. We enrolled 164 cardiac patients in a study about the effects of gratitude and optimism. Two weeks post-enrollment, participants completed a four-item questionnaire regarding motivations for study enrollment. Altruistic motivation ranked highest, while intellectual, health-related, and financial motivations rated lower. Four subgroups of participants emerged, each with distinct characteristics and different priorities for participating. These findings may help front-line clinicians to understand which motivations for participation apply to their clients who enroll in non-treatment-based research projects.

Indexed as

MotivationAcute Coronary SyndromeAltruismFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObservational Studies as TopicResearch SubjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesCardiacmotivationobservationalrecruitmentresearch participation

Identifiers

PMID26933943
PMCPMC4870048
OpenAlexW2292962935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.