Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26933523›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2016

Effects of Intraframe Distortion on Measures of Cone Mosaic Geometry from Adaptive Optics Scanning Light Ophthalmoscopy.

Robert F Cooper, Yusufu N Sulai, Adam M Dubis, Toco Y Chui, Richard B Rosen, Michel Michaelides, Alfredo Dubra, Joseph Carroll

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Adaptive Optics Imaging of Inherited Retinal Disease.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A 2-Year Longitudinal Study of Normal Cone Photoreceptor Density.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2019
    Article
  11. Adaptive optics imaging of inherited retinal diseases.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Photoreceptor-Based Biomarkers in AOSLO Retinal Imaging.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert F CooperBiomedical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Yusufu N SulaiOphthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Adam M DubisInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK ; Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
Toco Y ChuiNew York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA ; Department of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Richard B RosenNew York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA ; Department of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Michel MichaelidesInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK ; Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
Alfredo DubraBiomedical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA ; Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA ; Cell Biology, Neurobiology and Anatomy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA ; Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Joseph CarrollBiomedical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA ; Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA ; Cell Biology, Neurobiology and Anatomy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA ; Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Marquette University · USUniversity College London · GBIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USNew York Eye and Ear Infirmary · US

Funding

Clincal and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000055 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI SHAKER, REZA NONE · 2012 to 2015
$11.3M
MORPHOLOGY MODULEP30EY001931 · NEI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI BURKE, JANICE M. · 1985 to 2016
$9.8M
Assessing Photoreceptor Structure and Function in Normal and Diseased RetinaeR01EY017607 · NEI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Joseph Carroll · 2008 to 2026
$8.3M
Platform Technologies for Microscopic Retinal Imaging: Development & TranslationU01EY025477 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DUBRA, ALFREDO · 2015 to 2019
$4.4M
Retinal Versus Cortical Contributions to Vision Loss in AlbinismR01EY024969 · NEI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI CARROLL, JOSEPH, DEYOE, EDGAR A · 2015 to 2018
$2.0M
Axially-resolved Spectroscopic Ophthalmic ImagingR01EY025231 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DUBRA, ALFREDO · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
VISION RES LAB: HERPETIC KERATIC, CORE PIGMENT GENES, RETINITIS PIGMENTOSAC06RR016511 · NCRR · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI DUNN, MICHAEL J · 2002 to 2002
$1.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000055NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR016511NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001931NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017607NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024969NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025231NEI NIH HHS U01 EY025477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo characterize the effects of intraframe distortion due to involuntary eye motion on measures of cone mosaic geometry derived from adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope (AOSLO) images.

methodsWe acquired AOSLO image sequences from 20 subjects at 1.0, 2.0, and 5.0° temporal from fixation. An expert grader manually selected 10 minimally distorted reference frames from each 150-frame sequence for subsequent registration. Cone mosaic geometry was measured in all registered images (

resultsWe observed substantial variation across subjects in the repeatability of density (1.2%-8.7%), inter-cell distance (0.8%-4.6%), percentage of six-sided Voronoi cells (0.8%-10.6%), and Voronoi cell area regularity (VCAR) (1.2%-13.2%). The average of all metrics extracted from AOSLO images (with the exception of VCAR) was not significantly different than those derived from AO-fundus images, though there was variability between individual images.

conclusionsOur data demonstrate that the intraframe distortion found in AOSLO images can affect the accuracy and repeatability of cone mosaic metrics. It may be possible to use multiple images from the same retinal area to approximate a "distortionless" image, though more work is needed to evaluate the feasibility of this approach. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Even in subjects with good fixation, images from AOSLOs contain intraframe distortions due to eye motion during scanning. The existence of these artifacts emphasizes the need for caution when interpreting results derived from scanning instruments.

Indexed as

adaptive opticsimage analysisimage processingphotoreceptors

Identifiers

PMID26933523
PMCPMC4771077
OpenAlexW2293261223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.