ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2016
Utilization of a mental health collaborative care model among patients who require interpreter services.
Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Language proficiency and mental disorders among migrants: A systematic review.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2021Pooled it
- Interventions to Increase Depression Treatment Initiation in Primary Care Patients: a Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Collaborative Care for Depression among Patients with Limited English Proficiency: a Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Multilingualism in Psychotherapists in Training in Germany: Results of a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.Transcultural psychiatry · 2026Article
- Factors that influence access to primary healthcare services for migrants with a pre-existing mental ill-health diagnosis: a scoping review.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Integrated mental health for refugees: A realist theory building study.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
- Quality of Psychiatric Care for Immigrants and People With a Non-English Language Preference: A Systematic Scoping Review.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Depression Treatment After a Positive Depression Screen Result.JAMA internal medicine · 2025Article
- Usability of technological tools to overcome language barriers in health care: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2024Article
- "How's your mood": Recorded physician mental health conversations with Chinese and Latino patients in routine primary care visits.Patient education and counseling · 2023Article
- Does use of primary care-based behavioral health programs differ by race and ethnicity? Evidence from a multi-site collaborative care model.Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Reproductive health practices and use of health services among immigrant Indonesian women working in Malaysia.Revista de saude publica · 2022Article
- Closing the Gap: Participatory Formative Evaluation to Reduce Cancer Screening Disparities among Patients with Limited English Proficiency.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021Review
- Global Mental Health and Services for Migrants in Primary Care Settings in High-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Sustainability of collaborative care management for depression in primary care settings with academic affiliations across New York State.Implementation science : IS · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmigrants and refugees to the United States have a higher prevalence of depression compared to the general population and are less likely to receive adequate mental health services and treatment. Those with limited English proficiency (LEP) are at an even higher risk of inadequate mental health care. Collaborative care management (CCM) models for depression are effective in achieving treatment goals among a wide range of patient populations, including patients with LEP. The purpose of this study was to assess the utilization of a statewide initiative that uses CCM for depression management, among patients with LEP in a large primary care practice.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of patients with depression in a large primary care practice in Minnesota. Patients who met criteria for enrollment into the CCM [with a provider-generated diagnosis of depression or dysthymia in the electronic medical records, and a Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score ≥10]. Patient-identified need for interpreter services was used as a proxy for LEP. Rates of enrollment into the DIAMOND (Depression Improvement Across Minnesota, Offering A New Direction) program, a statewide initiative that uses CCM for depression management were measured. These rates were compared between eligible patients who require interpreter services versus patients who do not.
resultsOf the 7561 patients who met criteria for enrollment into the DIAMOND program during the study interval, 3511 were enrolled. Only 18.2 % of the eligible patients with LEP were enrolled into DIAMOND compared with the 47.2 % of the eligible English proficient patients. This finding persisted after adjustment for differences in age, gender and depression severity scores (adjusted OR [95 % confidence interval] = 0.43 [0.23, 0.81]).
conclusionsWithin primary care practices, tailored interventions are needed, including those that address cultural competence and language navigation, to improve the utilization of this effective model among patients with LEP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.