ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2016
Hospitalization of high and low inpatient service users before and after enrollment into Assertive Community Treatment teams: a naturalistic observational study.
Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assertive community treatment for adults with complex mental illness and emergency department use: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Assertive Community Treatment and ACT-Derived Outreach Models: A Scoping Review of Adaptations, Fidelity and Outcomes.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- Changes in inpatient mental health treatment and related costs before and after flexible assertive community treatment: a naturalistic observational cohort study.BMC psychiatry · 2025Observational
- Clinical outcomes and outcome predictors of two-year assertive community treatment in Norway: an explorative prospective pre-post study.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- Patients' experiences with coercive mental health treatment in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment: a qualitative study.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- The relationship between area levels of involuntary psychiatric care and patient outcomes: a longitudinal national register study from Norway.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Geographical variation in compulsory hospitalisation - ethical challenges.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Community-based Mental Health Services in Norway.Consortium psychiatricum · 2021Review
- Service User Experiences of How Flexible Assertive Community Treatment May Support or Inhibit Citizenship: A Qualitative Study.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Identifying patterns in psychiatric hospital stays with statistical methods: towards a typology of post-deinstitutionalization hospitalization trajectories.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2019Article
- Model fidelity and team members' experiences of assertive community treatment in Norway: a sequential mixed-methods study.International journal of mental health systems · 2019Article
- How clinicians make decisions about CTOs in ACT: a qualitative study.International journal of mental health systems · 2018Article
- Involuntary admission in Norwegian adult psychiatric hospitals: a systematic review.International journal of mental health systems · 2018Review
- Intensive Case Management for Addiction to promote engagement with care of people with severe mental and substance use disorders: an observational study.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2017Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAssertive Community Treatment (ACT) is more successful in reducing hospitalization when baseline use is high. However, with a growing recovery-focus, ACT may be useful for people with severe mental illness who are difficult to engage but not high users of inpatient services. This study investigated hospitalization 2 years before and 2 years after ACT enrollment amongst patients both with and without high inpatient services use before enrollment into ACT.
methodsThis naturalistic observational study included 142 patients from 12 different ACT teams throughout Norway. Of these, 74 (52 %) were high users of inpatient services before ACT. The teams assessed the patients upon enrollment using clinician-rated and self-reported questionnaires. Hospitalization data from 2 years before and 2 years after enrollment into ACT were obtained from the Norwegian Patient Registry. Linear mixed models were used to assess changes in hospitalization and to explore associations between these changes and patient characteristics.
resultsWhen the participants enrolled into the ACT teams, high users of inpatient care were younger, more often living alone and more often subject to involuntary outpatient treatment than low users. The participants spent significantly fewer days in hospital during the 2 years of ACT follow-up compared to the 2 years before enrollment. The reduction was more evident amongst high users, whereas low users had an initial increase in inpatient days in the first year of ACT and a subsequent decrease in the second year. More severe negative symptoms and previous high use of inpatient care were associated with a reduction in both total and involuntary inpatient days. Additionally, a reduction in involuntary inpatient days was associated with being subject to involuntary outpatient treatment upon enrollment into ACT.
conclusionThe findings in this study may suggest that ACT contributes to more appropriate use of inpatient care, possibly by reducing the presumably avoidable hospitalization of high users and increasing the presumably needed inpatient care of low users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.