Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26933446›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2016

Hospitalization of high and low inpatient service users before and after enrollment into Assertive Community Treatment teams: a naturalistic observational study.

Hanne Clausen, Anne Landheim, Sigrun Odden, Jūratė Šaltytė Benth, Kristin Sverdvik Heiervang, Hanne Kilen Stuen, Helen Killaspy, Torleif Ruud

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. How clinicians make decisions about CTOs in ACT: a qualitative study.International journal of mental health systems · 2018
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hanne ClausenDepartment of Research and Development, Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway ; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3282-6918
Anne LandheimNational Centre for Dual Diagnosis, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Brumunddal, Norway ; Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Sigrun OddenNational Centre for Dual Diagnosis, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Brumunddal, Norway.
Jūratė Šaltytė BenthInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway ; HØKH Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Kristin Sverdvik HeiervangDepartment of Research and Development, Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Hanne Kilen StuenNational Centre for Dual Diagnosis, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Brumunddal, Norway.
Helen KillaspyDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Torleif RuudDepartment of Research and Development, Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway ; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NOInnlandet Hospital Trust · NOAkershus University Hospital · NOUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssertive Community Treatment (ACT) is more successful in reducing hospitalization when baseline use is high. However, with a growing recovery-focus, ACT may be useful for people with severe mental illness who are difficult to engage but not high users of inpatient services. This study investigated hospitalization 2 years before and 2 years after ACT enrollment amongst patients both with and without high inpatient services use before enrollment into ACT.

methodsThis naturalistic observational study included 142 patients from 12 different ACT teams throughout Norway. Of these, 74 (52 %) were high users of inpatient services before ACT. The teams assessed the patients upon enrollment using clinician-rated and self-reported questionnaires. Hospitalization data from 2 years before and 2 years after enrollment into ACT were obtained from the Norwegian Patient Registry. Linear mixed models were used to assess changes in hospitalization and to explore associations between these changes and patient characteristics.

resultsWhen the participants enrolled into the ACT teams, high users of inpatient care were younger, more often living alone and more often subject to involuntary outpatient treatment than low users. The participants spent significantly fewer days in hospital during the 2 years of ACT follow-up compared to the 2 years before enrollment. The reduction was more evident amongst high users, whereas low users had an initial increase in inpatient days in the first year of ACT and a subsequent decrease in the second year. More severe negative symptoms and previous high use of inpatient care were associated with a reduction in both total and involuntary inpatient days. Additionally, a reduction in involuntary inpatient days was associated with being subject to involuntary outpatient treatment upon enrollment into ACT.

conclusionThe findings in this study may suggest that ACT contributes to more appropriate use of inpatient care, possibly by reducing the presumably avoidable hospitalization of high users and increasing the presumably needed inpatient care of low users.

Indexed as

Appropriate servicesAssertive community treatmentHigh inpatient service useHospitalization

Identifiers

PMID26933446
PMCPMC4772328
OpenAlexW2290421345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.