Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26933445›Full record

ArticleChemistry Central journal2016

Freeze-drying: an alternative method for the analysis of volatile organic compounds in the headspace of urine samples using solid phase micro-extraction coupled to gas chromatography - mass spectrometry.

Raphael B M Aggio, Arno Mayor, Séamus Coyle, Sophie Reade, Tanzeela Khalid, Norman M Ratcliffe, Chris S J Probert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemistry Central journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of HScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raphael B M AggioDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, L693BX Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6345-0859
Arno MayorDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, L693BX Liverpool, UK.
Séamus CoyleMarie Curie Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, University of Liverpool, London Road, L39TA Liverpool, UK.
Sophie ReadeDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, L693BX Liverpool, UK.
Tanzeela KhalidDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, L693BX Liverpool, UK ; Department of Surgery and Cancer, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, SW72AZ London, UK.
Norman M RatcliffeFaculty of Health and Applied Sciences, Frenchay Campus, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, BS161QY Bristol, UK.
Chris S J ProbertDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, L693BX Liverpool, UK.
University of Liverpool · GBUniversity of the West of England · GB

Funding

Marie Curie MCCC-APCU-15Marie Curie MCCC-FCO-11-L
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVolatile organic compounds (VOCs) can be intermediates of metabolic pathways and their levels in biological samples may provide a better understanding about diseases in addition to potential methods for diagnosis. Headspace analysis of VOCs in urine samples using solid phase micro extraction (SPME) coupled to gas chromatography - mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is one of the most used techniques. However, it generally produces a limited profile of VOCs if applied to fresh urine. Sample preparation methods, such as addition of salt, base or acid, have been developed to improve the headspace-SPME-GC-MS analysis of VOCs in urine samples. These methods result in a richer profile of VOCs, however, they may also add potential contaminants to the urine samples, result in increased variability introduced by manually processing the samples and promote degradation of metabolites due to extreme pH levels. Here, we evaluated if freeze-drying can be considered an alternative sample preparation method for headspace-SPME-GC-MS analysis of urine samples.

resultsWe collected urine from three volunteers and compared the performances of freeze-drying, addition of acid (HCl), addition of base (NaOH), addition of salt (NaCl), fresh urine and frozen urine when identifying and quantifying metabolites in 4 ml samples. Freeze-drying and addition of acid produced a significantly higher number of VOCs identified than any other method, with freeze-drying covering a slightly higher number of chemical classes, showing an improved repeatability and reducing siloxane impurities.

conclusionIn this work we compared the performance of sample preparation methods for the SPME-GC-MS analysis of urine samples. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the potential of freeze-dry as an alternative sample preparation method. Our results indicate that freeze-drying has potential to be used as an alternative method for the SPME-GC-MS analysis of urine samples. Additional studies using internal standard, synthetic urine and calibration curves will allow a more precise quantification of metabolites and additional comparisons between methods.Graphical abstractEnhancing VOC profiling from urine samples.

Indexed as

Freeze-dryGC-MSMetabolomicsSPMEUrineVOCVolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID26933445
PMCPMC4772446
OpenAlexW2289822272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.