Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26932810›Full record

ArticleLung2016

Pre-transplant Panel Reactive Antibody and Survival in Adult Cystic Fibrosis Patients After Lung Transplantation.

Don Hayes, Dmitry Tumin, Joseph D Tobias

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lung, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Don HayesDepartment of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA. hayes.705@osu.edu.
Dmitry TuminDepartment of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Joseph D TobiasDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvival implications of pre-transplant antibodies to human leukocyte antigens prior to lung transplantation (LTx) in adult cystic fibrosis (CF) patients are unknown.

methodsData from the United Network for Organ Sharing Registry (1987-2013) were used to compare survival differences in adult CF patients with pre-transplant class I and II panel reactive antibody (PRA) levels ≤10 versus >10 %.

resultsOf 3149 CF LTx recipients, 1526 and 1399 were included in univariate survival analyses of class I and II PRA, respectively, while 1106 and 1001 were included in multivariate Cox analyses for class I and class II, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival functions failed to demonstrate significant differences in survival with PRA >10 % for class I (Log-rank test: χ (2) (df = 1): 1.11, p = 0.293) or class II (Log-rank test: χ (2) (df = 1): 0.99, p = 0.320). Adjusting for covariates, multivariate Cox models demonstrated that class II PRA >10 % was associated with a significant increase in mortality hazard (HR 1.918; 95 % CI 1.128, 3.261; p = 0.016), whereas class I PRA >10 % was uncorrelated with this outcome.

conclusionsPre-transplant PRA class II >10 % in adult CF patients is associated with elevated mortality hazard after LTx.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodiesCystic FibrosisFemaleHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung TransplantationMalePreoperative PeriodProportional Hazards ModelsRegistriesSurvival RateTissue DonorsTransplant RecipientsAntibodiesHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIAdultCystic fibrosisHuman leukocyte antigenLung transplantationPanel reactive antibodySurvival

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.