Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26932669›Full record

ReviewDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2016

A comparative view of regenerative neurogenesis in vertebrates.

Alessandro Alunni, Laure Bally-Cuif

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development (Cambridge, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Mesenchymal-derived neural progenitors underlie localbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ultrastructural Characteristics of the Juvenile Chum Salmon (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Wnt/β-catenin Signaling in Central Nervous System Regeneration.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alessandro AlunniParis-Saclay Institute for Neuroscience, CNRS UMR9197 - Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Team Zebrafish Neurogenetics, Avenue de la Terrasse, Building 5, Gif-sur-Yvette F-91198, France.
Laure Bally-CuifParis-Saclay Institute for Neuroscience, CNRS UMR9197 - Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Team Zebrafish Neurogenetics, Avenue de la Terrasse, Building 5, Gif-sur-Yvette F-91198, France bally-cuif@inaf.cnrs-gif.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In all vertebrate species studied thus far, the adult central nervous system harbors neural stem cells that sustain constitutive neurogenesis, as well as latent neural progenitors that can be awakened in lesional contexts. In spite of this common theme, many species differ dramatically in their ability to recruit constitutive progenitors, to awaken latent progenitors, or to enhance or bias neural progenitor fate to achieve successful neuronal repair. This Review summarizes the striking similarities in the essential molecular and cellular properties of adult neural stem cells between different vertebrate species, both under physiological and reparative conditions. It also emphasizes the differences in the reparative process across evolution and how the study of non-mammalian models can provide insights into both basic neural stem cell properties and stimulatory cues shared between vertebrates, and subsequent neurogenic events, which are abortive under reparative conditions in mammals.

Indexed as

RegenerationAdultAdult Stem CellsAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBrainCell DifferentiationCentral Nervous SystemHumansMiceNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisNeurogliaNeuronsPhylogenyRatsReceptors, NotchLesionNeural stem cellsNeurogenesisRepairZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID26932669
PMCPMC4813331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.