ArticleBMC medical genomics2016
Cancer survival analysis using semi-supervised learning method based on Cox and AFT models with L1/2 regularization.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating key predictors of breast cancer through survival: a comparison of AFT frailty models with LASSO, ridge, and elastic net regularization.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Semisupervised Calibration of Risk with Noisy Event Times (SCORNET) using electronic health record data.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Improve individual treatment by comparing treatment benefits: cancer artificial intelligence survival analysis system for cervical carcinoma.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Integrating molecular interactions and gene expression to identify biomarkers and network modules of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2022Article
- Semi-supervised vision transformer with adaptive token sampling for breast cancer classification.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Deep learning-based ovarian cancer subtypes identification using multi-omics data.BioData mining · 2020Article
- Machine Learning Based Computational Gene Selection Models: A Survey, Performance Evaluation, Open Issues, and Future Research Directions.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
- Robust identification of gene-environment interactions for prognosis using a quantile partial correlation approach.Genomics · 2019Article
- Risk prediction models for dementia constructed by supervised principal component analysis using miRNA expression data.Communications biology · 2019Article
- GradientScanSurv-An exhaustive association test method for gene expression data with censored survival outcome.PloS one · 2018Review
- A new semi-supervised learning model combined with Cox and SP-AFT models in cancer survival analysis.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne of the most important objectives of the clinical cancer research is to diagnose cancer more accurately based on the patients' gene expression profiles. Both Cox proportional hazards model (Cox) and accelerated failure time model (AFT) have been widely adopted to the high risk and low risk classification or survival time prediction for the patients' clinical treatment. Nevertheless, two main dilemmas limit the accuracy of these prediction methods. One is that the small sample size and censored data remain a bottleneck for training robust and accurate Cox classification model. In addition to that, similar phenotype tumours and prognoses are actually completely different diseases at the genotype and molecular level. Thus, the utility of the AFT model for the survival time prediction is limited when such biological differences of the diseases have not been previously identified.
methodsTo try to overcome these two main dilemmas, we proposed a novel semi-supervised learning method based on the Cox and AFT models to accurately predict the treatment risk and the survival time of the patients. Moreover, we adopted the efficient L1/2 regularization approach in the semi-supervised learning method to select the relevant genes, which are significantly associated with the disease.
resultsThe results of the simulation experiments show that the semi-supervised learning model can significant improve the predictive performance of Cox and AFT models in survival analysis. The proposed procedures have been successfully applied to four real microarray gene expression and artificial evaluation datasets.
conclusionsThe advantages of our proposed semi-supervised learning method include: 1) significantly increase the available training samples from censored data; 2) high capability for identifying the survival risk classes of patient in Cox model; 3) high predictive accuracy for patients' survival time in AFT model; 4) strong capability of the relevant biomarker selection. Consequently, our proposed semi-supervised learning model is one more appropriate tool for survival analysis in clinical cancer research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.