ReviewEuropean journal of nutrition2016
Caffeine and cardiovascular diseases: critical review of current research.
Review in European journal of nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- The recovery effect of acute aerobic exercise and music intervention on working memory under mental fatigue.Experimental brain research · 2025Trial
- Caffeine ingestion alters central hemodynamics following aerobic exercise in middle-aged men.European journal of applied physiology · 2021Trial
- The Acute Effects of Caffeinated Black Coffee on Cognition and Mood in Healthy Young and Older Adults.Nutrients · 2018Trial
- Porphyrin-functionalized molecularly imprinted paper sensor for selective colorimetric detection of caffeine in beverage samples.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Developing cardiac biomechanical models beyond the clinic: modeling stressors of daily life.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025Review
- Repeated measures of coffee consumption and risk of future incident venous thromboembolism-the Trøndelag Health Study and the Tromsø study.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- Interpretable machine learning for cardiovascular risk prediction: Insights from NHANES dietary and health data.PloS one · 2025Article
- Caffeine: A Multifunctional Efficacious Molecule with Diverse Health Implications and Emerging Delivery Systems.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- The risk of premature cardiac contractions (PAC/PVC) related to caffeine consumption among healthcare workers: A comprehensive review.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Coffee intake leads to preeclampsia-like syndromes in susceptible pregnant rats.Journal of nutritional science · 2024Article
- Review
- Orange/far-red hybrid voltage indicators with reduced phototoxicity enable reliable long-term imaging in neurons and cardiomyocytes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Coffee consumption and associations with blood pressure, LDL-cholesterol and echocardiographic measures in the general population.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Review
- Mental Performance and Sport: Caffeine and Co-consumed Bioactive Ingredients.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Review
- Clinical Effect of Electroacupuncture on Acute Sleep Deprivation and Event-Related Potential Affecting the Inhibition Control of the Brain: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- NMR, RP-HPLC-PDA-ESI-MSMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- Targeting Melanoma-Initiating Cells by Caffeine: In Silico and In Vitro Approaches.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Retinoic Acid Signaling Plays a Crucial Role in Excessive Caffeine Intake-Disturbed Apoptosis and Differentiation of Myogenic Progenitors.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Caffeine is a most widely consumed physiological stimulant worldwide, which is consumed via natural sources, such as coffee and tea, and now marketed sources such as energy drinks and other dietary supplements. This wide use has led to concerns regarding the safety of caffeine and its proposed beneficial role in alertness, performance and energy expenditure and side effects in the cardiovascular system. The question remains "Which dose is safe?", as the population does not appear to adhere to the strict guidelines listed on caffeine consumption. Studies in humans and animal models yield controversial results, which can be explained by population, type and dose of caffeine and low statistical power. This review will focus on comprehensive and critical review of the current literature and provide an avenue for further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26932503What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.