Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26932466›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2016

Input estimation for drug discovery using optimal control and Markov chain Monte Carlo approaches.

Magnus Trägårdh, Michael J Chappell, Andrea Ahnmark, Daniel Lindén, Neil D Evans, Peter Gennemark

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Input Estimation for Extended-Release Formulations Exemplified with Exenatide.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Magnus TrägårdhUniversity of Warwick, School of Engineering, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. m.a.tragardh@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0440-6775
Michael J ChappellUniversity of Warwick, School of Engineering, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Andrea AhnmarkCVMD iMed Bioscience, AstraZeneca R&D, 431 83, Mölndal, Sweden.
Daniel LindénCVMD iMed Bioscience, AstraZeneca R&D, 431 83, Mölndal, Sweden.
Neil D EvansUniversity of Warwick, School of Engineering, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Peter GennemarkCVMD iMed DMPK, AstraZeneca R&D, 431 83, Mölndal, Sweden.
AstraZeneca (Sweden) · SEUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Input estimation is employed in cases where it is desirable to recover the form of an input function which cannot be directly observed and for which there is no model for the generating process. In pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling, input estimation in linear systems (deconvolution) is well established, while the nonlinear case is largely unexplored. In this paper, a rigorous definition of the input-estimation problem is given, and the choices involved in terms of modelling assumptions and estimation algorithms are discussed. In particular, the paper covers Maximum a Posteriori estimates using techniques from optimal control theory, and full Bayesian estimation using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approaches. These techniques are implemented using the optimisation software CasADi, and applied to two example problems: one where the oral absorption rate and bioavailability of the drug eflornithine are estimated using pharmacokinetic data from rats, and one where energy intake is estimated from body-mass measurements of mice exposed to monoclonal antibodies targeting the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1c. The results from the analysis are used to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the methods used when applied to sparsely sampled data. The presented methods for optimal control are fast and robust, and can be recommended for use in drug discovery. The MCMC-based methods can have long running times and require more expertise from the user. The rigorous definition together with the illustrative examples and suggestions for software serve as a highly promising starting point for application of input-estimation methods to problems in drug discovery.

Indexed as

Markov ChainsMonte Carlo MethodAlgorithmsAnimalsBayes TheoremBiological AvailabilityComputer SimulationDrug DiscoveryEflornithineMiceModels, StatisticalRatsRegression AnalysisSoftwareEflornithineDeconvolutionInput estimationMarkov Chain Monte Carlo methodNonlinear dynamic systemsOptimal control

Identifiers

PMID26932466
PMCPMC4791487
OpenAlexW2294048703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.