Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26932143›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Managing the screen-viewing behaviours of children aged 5-6 years: a qualitative analysis of parental strategies.

R Jago, J Zahra, M J Edwards, J M Kesten, E Solomon-Moore, J L Thompson, S J Sebire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Screen-based media and young children: Review and recommendations.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Typologies of Family Functioning and 24-h Movement Behaviors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Observational
  16. Article
  17. Exploring Mediation Roles of Child Screen-Viewing between Parental Factors and Child Overweight in Taiwan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

R JagoCentre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
J ZahraCentre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
M J EdwardsCentre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
J M KestenSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
E Solomon-MooreCentre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
J L ThompsonSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
S J SebireCentre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/11/51/28986British Heart Foundation SP/14/4/31123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe present study used qualitative methods to: (1) examine the strategies that were used by parents of children aged 5-6 years to manage screen viewing; (2) identify key factors that affect the implementation of the strategies and (3) develop suggestions for future intervention content.

designTelephone interviews were conducted with parents of children aged 5-6 years participating in a larger study. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using an inductive and deductive content analysis. Coding and theme generation was iterative and refined throughout.

settingParents were recruited through 57 primary schools located in the greater Bristol area (UK).

participants53 parents of children aged 5-6 years.

resultsParents reported that for many children, screen viewing was a highly desirable behaviour that was difficult to manage, and that parents used the provision of screen viewing as a tool for reward and/or punishment. Parents managed screen viewing by setting limits in relation to daily events such as meals, before and after school, and bedtime. Screen-viewing rules were often altered depending on parental preferences and tasks. Inconsistent messaging within and between parents represented a source of conflict at times. Potential strategies to facilitate reducing screen viewing were identified, including setting screen-viewing limits in relation to specific events, collaborative rule setting, monitoring that involves mothers, fathers and the child, developing a family-specific set of alternative activities to screen viewing and developing a child's ability to self-monitor their own screen viewing.

conclusionsManaging screen viewing is a challenge for many parents and can often cause tension in the home. The data presented in this paper provide key suggestions of new approaches that could be incorporated into behaviour change programmes to reduce child screen viewing.

Indexed as

ParentingSedentary BehaviorTelevisionVideo GamesAdultChildChild, PreschoolComputersFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleParentsSchoolsSmartphoneUnited KingdomChildrenInterviewParentScreen-viewing

Identifiers

PMID26932143
PMCPMC4785319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.