Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26931666›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2016

How does nutritional state change during a subacute admission? Findings and implications for practice.

J Collins, J Porter, H Truby, C E Huggins

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Grip Strength as a Cardiometabolic Marker.Korean journal of family medicine · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Need for theBMC nutrition · 2017
    Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J CollinsBe Active Sleep Eat Facility, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC, Australia.
J PorterBe Active Sleep Eat Facility, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC, Australia.
H TrubyBe Active Sleep Eat Facility, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC, Australia.
C E HugginsBe Active Sleep Eat Facility, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesNutritional status influences patients' clinical and functional outcomes. The aims were to identify changes in nutritional state during subacute care and associated participant characteristics. SUBJECTS/

methodsA longitudinal study was undertaken with consecutive patients admitted to subacute care wards during a 3-month period. Participants were recruited under a waiver of consent to reflect the usual demographic. Change in classification (malnourished, at risk of malnutrition, well nourished) of the full Mini Nutritional Assessment (full MNA) between admission and discharge was the primary outcome. Weight (kg), mid-arm and calf circumference (cm) change were secondary outcomes. Hand grip strength (kg) and fat-free mass (kg) (assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis) were measured for a consenting subgroup.

resultsParticipants (n=248, 36.7% male) had a median age of 80 years and a length of stay of 17 days. On admission, 29.1% were classified as malnourished. By discharge, nutritional classification remained stable for 62.0% of participants (n=132), declined for 10.3% (n=22) and improved for 27.7% (n=59, including 52.5% malnourished on admission). Impaired cognition (odds ratio (OR)=0.169, P=0.002) and higher full MNA score at admission (OR=0.870, P=0.001) reduced odds of improvement in full MNA. There was no change in hand grip strength (n=46), but there was a decline in mean fat-free mass (-1.1 kg, 95% confidence interval: -0.1 to -2.2 kg, P=0.043, n=24).

conclusionsMultidisciplinary care supports the nutritional state of most patients admitted to subacute care. Those with cognitive impairments or at risk of malnutrition were less likely to demonstrate improvement and may benefit from more intensive or tailored nutritional care.

Indexed as

HospitalizationNutritional StatusAgedAged, 80 and overElectric ImpedanceFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHand StrengthHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMalnutritionNutrition AssessmentRisk FactorsSubacute Care

Identifiers

PMID26931666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.