Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26931607›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2016

Biofilm control with natural and genetically-modified phages.

Amir Mohaghegh Motlagh, Ananda Shankar Bhattacharjee, Ramesh Goel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Biofilm Formation by Pathogenic Bacteria: Applying aPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Phage φAB6-Borne Depolymerase CombatsAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Bacteriophages in water pollution control: Advantages and limitations.Frontiers of environmental science & engineering · 2021
    Article
  20. Phages for Biofilm Removal.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amir Mohaghegh MotlaghDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Utah, 110 S Central Campus Drive, Salt Lake City, 84112, UT, USA.
Ananda Shankar BhattacharjeeDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Utah, 110 S Central Campus Drive, Salt Lake City, 84112, UT, USA.
Ramesh GoelDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Utah, 110 S Central Campus Drive, Salt Lake City, 84112, UT, USA. ram.goel@utah.edu.
University of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteriophages, as the most dominant and diverse entities in the universe, have the potential to be one of the most promising therapeutic agents. The emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria and the antibiotic crisis in the last few decades have resulted in a renewed interest in phage therapy. Furthermore, bacteriophages, with the capacity to rapidly infect and overcome bacterial resistance, have demonstrated a sustainable approach against bacterial pathogens-particularly in biofilm. Biofilm, as complex microbial communities located at interphases embedded in a matrix of bacterial extracellular polysaccharide substances (EPS), is involved in health issues such as infections associated with the use of biomaterials and chronic infections by multidrug resistant bacteria, as well as industrial issues such as biofilm formation on stainless steel surfaces in food industry and membrane biofouling in water and wastewater treatment processes. In this paper, the most recent studies on the potential of phage therapy using natural and genetically-modified lytic phages and their associated enzymes in fighting biofilm development in various fields including engineering, industry, and medical applications are reviewed. Phage-mediated prevention approaches as an indirect phage therapy strategy are also explored in this review. In addition, the limitations of these approaches and suggestions to overcome these constraints are discussed to enhance the efficiency of phage therapy process. Finally, future perspectives and directions for further research towards a better understanding of phage therapy to control biofilm are recommended.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsBacterial Physiological PhenomenaBacteriophagesBiofilmsBiofoulingDrug Resistance, BacterialFeasibility StudiesHumansLysogenyBiofilmCRISPREngineered phageGenetically-modified phageMembrane biofoulingPhage therapy

Identifiers

PMID26931607
OpenAlexW2315755647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.