Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26931369›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2016

Immunobiological effects of gemcitabine and capecitabine combination chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Gary Middleton, William Greenhalf, Eithne Costello, Victoria Shaw, Trevor Cox, Paula Ghaneh, Daniel H Palmer, John P Neoptolemos

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Antitumor Drugs and Their Targets.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  11. The dark side of immunotherapy: pancreatic cancer.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2020
    Review
  12. Telomerase-Targeted Cancer Immunotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  13. Therapeutic developments in pancreatic cancer: current and future perspectives.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gary MiddletonInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham B15 2TT and University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK.
William GreenhalfNational Institutes of Health Research Liverpool Pancreas Biomedical Research Unit and Clinical Directorate of General Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GA, UK.
Eithne CostelloNational Institutes of Health Research Liverpool Pancreas Biomedical Research Unit and Clinical Directorate of General Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GA, UK.
Victoria ShawNational Institutes of Health Research Liverpool Pancreas Biomedical Research Unit and Clinical Directorate of General Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GA, UK.
Trevor CoxCancer Research UK Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Block C Waterhouse Building, 1-3 Brownlow Street, Liverpool L69 3GA, UK.
Paula GhanehNational Institutes of Health Research Liverpool Pancreas Biomedical Research Unit and Clinical Directorate of General Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GA, UK.
Daniel H PalmerNational Institutes of Health Research Liverpool Pancreas Biomedical Research Unit and Clinical Directorate of General Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GA, UK.
John P NeoptolemosNational Institutes of Health Research Liverpool Pancreas Biomedical Research Unit and Clinical Directorate of General Surgery, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GA, UK.
Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBCancer Research UK · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11883Cancer Research UK 12820Cancer Research UK 15957Cancer Research UK 16186Cancer Research UK 16812Cancer Research UK 17680Cancer Research UK 8968Department of Health 08/29/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreclinical studies suggest that chemotherapy may enhance the immune response against pancreatic cancer.

methodsThe levels of granulocyte macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) and the associated inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP) were assessed in 38 patients receiving gemcitabine and capecitabine combination chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer within the TeloVac trial. Apoptosis (M30) and total immune response (delayed-type hypersensitivity and/or T-cell response) were also assessed and levels of apoptosis induction correlated with immune response. The telomerase GV1001 vaccine was given either sequentially (n=18) or concomitantly (n=24) with the combination chemotherapy.

resultsThere were no differences between baseline and post-treatment levels of CRP (P=0.19), IL-6 (P=0.19) and GM-CSF (P=0.71). There was a positive correlation between post-chemotherapy CRP and IL-6 levels (r=0.45, P=0.005) and between CRP with carbohydrate antigen-19-9 (CA19-9) levels at baseline (r=0.45, P=0.015) and post treatment (r=0.40, P=0.015). The change in CRP and IL-6 levels was positively correlated (r=0.40, P=0.012). Hazard ratios (95% CI) for baseline CA19-9 (1.30 (1.07-1.59), P=0.009) and CRP (1.55 (1.00-2.39), P=0.049) levels were each independently predictive of survival. The M30 mean matched differences between pre- and post-chemotherapy showed evidence of apoptosis in both the sequential (P=0.058) and concurrent (P=0.0018) chemoimmunotherapy arms. Respectively, 5 of 10 and 9 of 20 patients had a positive immune response but there was no association with apoptosis.

conclusionsCombination gemcitabine and capecitabine chemotherapy did not affect circulating levels of GM-CSF, IL-6 and CRP. Chemotherapy-induced apoptosis was not associated with the immunogenicity induced by the GV1001 vaccine in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsApoptosisCA-19-9 AntigenCancer VaccinesCapecitabineCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCell ProliferationC-Reactive ProteinDeoxycytidineFemaleGemcitabineGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansHypersensitivity, DelayedCA-19-9 AntigenCancer VaccinesCapecitabineC-Reactive ProteinDeoxycytidineGemcitabineGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorGV1001 peptideIL6 protein, humanInterleukin-6Peptide FragmentsTelomerase

Identifiers

PMID26931369
PMCPMC4782200
OpenAlexW2295178911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.