Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26931237›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2016

Operational challenges to continuous LLIN distribution: a qualitative rapid assessment in four countries.

Katherine Theiss-Nyland, Waqo Ejersa, Corine Karema, Diakalia Koné, Hannah Koenker, Yves Cyaka, Matthew Lynch, Jayne Webster, Jo Lines

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Katherine Theiss-NylandInfectious Disease Epidemiology Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK. katherinetn@gmail.com.
Waqo EjersaMalaria Control Unit, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya. abbadhullo@yahoo.com.au.
Corine KaremaMalaria and other Parasitic Diseases Division, Rwanda Biomedical Centre, Kigali, Rwanda. ckarema@gmail.com.
Diakalia KonéProgramme National de Lutte Contre le Paludisme, Ministere de la Sante et l'Hygiene Publique, Bamako, Mali. dkone1311@yahoo.fr.
Hannah KoenkerCenter for Communication Programs, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. hkoenker@jhu.edu.
Yves CyakaTropical Health LLP, London, UK. yvescyaka@yahoo.fr.
Matthew LynchCenter for Communication Programs, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. mlynch@jhu.edu.
Jayne WebsterDisease Control Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK. jayne.webster@lshtm.ac.uk.
Jo LinesDisease Control Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK. jo.lines@lshtm.ac.uk.
University of London · GBJohns Hopkins University · USMinistère de la Santé et de l'Hygiène Publique · MLMinistry of Health · KERwanda Biomedical Center · RWYahoo (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization recommends that long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) for malaria prevention should be distributed continuously through antenatal care (ANC) and the expanded programme on immunization (EPI) in addition to mass campaigns. Despite these recommendations, the continuous distribution (CD) of LLIN distribution through ANC and EPI is not policy in many countries, and where there is a policy, implementation is incomplete. This study aims to identify the operational strengths and weaknesses of LLINs CD in four country programmes in sub-Saharan Africa.

methodsA qualitative rapid assessment process was conducted using semi-structured individual and group interviews at the national, sub-national, and facility level in four countries. Seventy participants were included (23 in Kenya, 13 in Malawi, 18 in Mali and 16 in Rwanda), drawn from malaria programmes, ANC and EPI programmes, government logistics units, and partner organizations. Interviews were structured to identify themes within a health systems approach. Policy and guideline documents and data collection tools were reviewed as a means of triangulation. Data analysis focused on pre-determined and emergent themes.

resultsThe four countries used a wide variety of management systems for the supply of LLINs to routine services. Issues related to quantification, supply logistics and data collection all contributed to stock-outs at facility level. None of the four countries had guidelines for responding to stock-outs or system enabling local staff to request additional supplies of LLINs. In all four countries, data collection of LLIN distribution was incomplete or absent at facility level, and such data were not used for planning. Training of staff at the facility level was implemented less frequently than national and sub-national staff would have preferred. Logistics systems, independent of other commodities, and in-country partner support strengthened the continuous distribution of LLINs.

conclusionsIn these countries, stock-outs were the most important single obstacle to the smooth operations of continuous LLIN distribution. Stock-outs can be avoided if facilities have the capacity to place orders for LLIN resupply as needed. Revised data collection and management systems for LLIN distribution have the potential to increase coverage of the target populations by improving LLIN stock-out response, and strengthening monitoring and evaluation of distribution.

Indexed as

Insecticide-Treated BednetsMosquito ControlAfrica South of the SaharaHealth Services ResearchHumansMalaria

Identifiers

PMID26931237
PMCPMC4774176
OpenAlexW2292194394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.