Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26930655›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

GW-Bodies and P-Bodies Constitute Two Separate Pools of Sequestered Non-Translating RNAs.

Prajal H Patel, Scott A Barbee, J Todd Blankenship

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Processing body (P-body) and its mediators in cancer.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. RNA Granules: A View from the RNA Perspective.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Prajal H PatelDepartment of Biological Sciences and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
Scott A BarbeeDepartment of Biological Sciences and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
J Todd BlankenshipDepartment of Biological Sciences and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
Roosevelt Institute · USUniversity of Denver · US

Funding

Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
Dynamics of Epithelial Polarity Proteins and the Control of Tissue ArchitectureR01GM090065 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF DENVER (COLORADO SEMINARY) · PI BLANKENSHIP, JAMES TODD · 2011 to 2015
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM090065NIH HHS P40 OD018537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-translating RNAs that have undergone active translational repression are culled from the cytoplasm into P-bodies for decapping-dependent decay or for sequestration. Organisms that use microRNA-mediated RNA silencing have an additional pathway to remove RNAs from active translation. Consequently, proteins that govern microRNA-mediated silencing, such as GW182/Gw and AGO1, are often associated with the P-bodies of higher eukaryotic organisms. Due to the presence of Gw, these structures have been referred to as GW-bodies. However, several reports have indicated that GW-bodies have different dynamics to P-bodies. Here, we use live imaging to examine GW-body and P-body dynamics in the early Drosophila melanogaster embryo. While P-bodies are present throughout early embryonic development, cytoplasmic GW-bodies only form in significant numbers at the midblastula transition. Unlike P-bodies, which are predominantly cytoplasmic, GW-bodies are present in both nuclei and the cytoplasm. RNA decapping factors such as DCP1, Me31B, and Hpat are not associated with GW-bodies, indicating that P-bodies and GW-bodies are distinct structures. Furthermore, known Gw interactors such as AGO1 and the CCR4-NOT deadenylation complex, which have been shown to be important for Gw function, are also not present in GW-bodies. Use of translational inhibitors puromycin and cycloheximide, which respectively increase or decrease cellular pools of non-translating RNAs, alter GW-body size, underscoring that GW-bodies are composed of non-translating RNAs. Taken together, these data indicate that active translational silencing most likely does not occur in GW-bodies. Instead GW-bodies most likely function as repositories for translationally silenced RNAs. Finally, inhibition of zygotic gene transcription is unable to block the formation of either P-bodies or GW-bodies in the early embryo, suggesting that these structures are composed of maternal RNAs.

Indexed as

AnimalsArgonaute ProteinsCytoplasmDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsMicroRNAsProtein BiosynthesisRNA InterferenceRNA, Long NoncodingTranscription, GeneticAGO1 protein, DrosophilaArgonaute ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsGw protein, DrosophilaMicroRNAsRNA, Long Noncoding

Identifiers

PMID26930655
PMCPMC4773245
OpenAlexW2290294032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.